Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33363025›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2020

Development and Validation of a Nomogram for Predicting Radiation-Induced Temporal Lobe Injury in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

Wenqiang Guan, Kang Xie, Yixin Fan, Stefan Lin, Rui Huang, Qianlong Tang, Ailin Chen, Yanqiong Song, Jinyi Lang, Peng Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Nomogram for distant metastasis-free survival in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Wenqiang GuanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu, China.
Kang XieDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu, China.
Yixin FanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu, China.
Stefan LinDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Office for Student Affairs, School of Statistics, Economics Institute, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Rui HuangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu, China.
Qianlong TangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu, China.
Ailin ChenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu, China.
Yanqiong SongDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu, China.
Jinyi LangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu, China.
Peng ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu, China.
Sichuan Cancer Hospital · CNUniversity of Electronic Science and Technology of China · CNUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose was to develop and validate a nomogram for prediction on radiation-induced temporal lobe injury (TLI) in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

methodsThe prediction model was developed based on a primary cohort that consisted of 194 patients. The data was gathered from January 2008 to December 2010. Clinical factors associated with TLI and dose-volume histograms for 388 evaluable temporal lobes were analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to develop the predicting model, which was conducted by R software. The performance of the nomogram was assessed with calibration and discrimination. An external validation cohort contained 197 patients from January 2011 to December 2013.

resultsAmong the 391 patients, 77 patients had TLI. Prognostic factors contained in the nomogram were Dmax (the maximum point dose) of temporal lobe, D1cc (the maximum dose delivered to a volume of 1 ml), T stage, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios (NLRs). The Internal validation showed good discrimination, with a C-index of 0.847 [95%CI 0.800 to 0.893], and good calibration. Application of the nomogram in the external validation cohort still obtained good discrimination (C-index, 0.811 [95% CI, 0.751 to 0.870]) and acceptable calibration.

conclusionsThis study developed and validated a nomogram, which may be conveniently applied for the individualized prediction of TLI.

Indexed as

chemoradiotherapynasopharyngeal carcinomaneutrophil-to-lymphocyte rationomogramtemporal lobe injury

Identifiers

PMID33363025
PMCPMC7761292
OpenAlexW3111784762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.