ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal oncology2020
Clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of 77 cases with type 3 gastric neuroendocrine tumours.
Article in World journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the stomach. Update on diagnostic criteria, classification, and prognostic markers.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026Review
- Gastric Neuroendocrine Tumors and Pernicious Anemia: A Case Report and Literature Review.Cureus · 2024Article
- Modern Management of Gastric Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.Current treatment options in oncology · 2024Review
- Predictors of Outcomes in Gastric Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Retrospective Cohort.GE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology · 2024Article
- Advances in Endoscopic Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastric Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2024Review
- Type 3 gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms: the rising promise of conservative endoscopic management.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Review
- Gastric Neuroendocrine Tumors (g-NETs): A Systematic Review of the Management and Outcomes of Type 3 g-NETs.Cancers · 2023Review
- Current status of the role of endoscopy in evaluation and management of gastrointestinal and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2023Review
- Endoscopic techniques for gastric neuroendocrine tumors: An update.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFor the rarity of type 3 gastric neuroendocrine tumours (g-NETs), their clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis are not well illustrated.
aimTo describe the clinicopathological features and outcome of type 3 g-NETs in the Chinese population.
methodsBased on the 2019 WHO pathological classification, the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of patients with type 3 g-NETs in China were retrospectively analysed.
resultsA total of 77 patients (55.8% of females) with type 3 g-NETs were analysed, with a median age of 48 years (range: 28-79 years). The tumours were mainly located in the gastric fundus/body (83.1%) and were mostly solitary (83.1%), with a median size of 1.5 cm (0.8-3.5 cm). Of these, there were 37 G1 tumours (48.1%), 31 G2 (40.3%), and 9 G3 (11.7%). Ten (13.0%) and 24 (31.2%) patients had lymph node and distant metastasis, respectively. In addition, type 3 g-NETs were heterogeneous. Compared with G1 NETs, G2 NETs had a higher lymph node metastasis rate, and G3 NETs had a higher distant metastasis rate. G1 and G2 NETs with stage I/II disease (33/68) received endoscopic treatment, and no tumour recurrence or tumour-related death was observed within a median follow-up time of 36 mo. Grade and distant metastasis were identified to be independent risk factors for prognosis in multivariable analysis.
conclusionType 3 g-NETs are obviously heterogeneous, and the updated WHO 2019 pathological classification may be used to effectively evaluate their biological behaviors and prognosis. Also, endoscopic treatment should be considered for small (< 2 cm), low grade, superficial tumours.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.