Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33362909›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal oncology2020

Cholecystectomy reduces subsequent cholangiocarcinoma risk in choledocholithiasis patients undergoing endoscopic intervention.

Chi-Chih Wang, Ming-Hseng Tseng, Sheng-Wen Wu, Tzu-Wei Yang, Hsuan-Yi Chen, Wen-Wei Sung, Chang-Cheng Su, Yao-Tung Wang, Chun-Che Lin, Ming-Chang Tsai

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 74% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chi-Chih WangDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, and Institute of Medicine, School of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung 40201, Taiwan.
Ming-Hseng TsengDepartment of Medical Informatics, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung 402, Taiwan.
Sheng-Wen WuDepartment of Internal Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital and School of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung 402, Taiwan.
Tzu-Wei YangDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, and Institute of Medicine, School of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung 40201, Taiwan.
Hsuan-Yi ChenDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, and Institute of Medicine, School of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung 40201, Taiwan.
Wen-Wei SungDepartment of Urology, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, and Institute of Medicine, School of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung 40201, Taiwan.
Chang-Cheng SuDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, and Institute of Medicine, School of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung 40201, Taiwan.
Yao-Tung WangDivision of Pulmonary Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, and Institute of Medicine, School of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung 402, Taiwan.
Chun-Che LinDepartment of Internal Medicine, China Medical University Hospital and School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung 402, Taiwan.
Ming-Chang TsaiDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, and Institute of Medicine, School of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung 40201, Taiwan. tsaimc1110@gmail.com.
Chung Shan Medical University · TWChung Shan Medical University Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCholangiocarcinoma is a disease with a high mortality rate. Our previous study revealed that cholelithiasis patients who undergo endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES)/endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation are at a higher risk for subsequent cholangiocarcinoma than cholelithiasis patients who undergo cholecystectomy.

aimTo clarify the relationship between recurrent biliary events and subsequent cholangiocarcinoma risk in choledocholithiasis patients.

methodsFrom one million random cases in the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database 2004-2011, we selected symptomatic choledocholithiasis patients older than 18 years who were admitted from January 2005 to December 2009 (study group). Cases for a control group were defined as individuals who had never been diagnosed with cholelithiasis, matched by sex and age in a 1:3 ratio. The study group was further divided into ES/endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation, both ES/endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation and cholecystectomy, and no intervention groups.

resultsWe included 2096 choledocholithiasis patients without previous intervention or cholangiocarcinoma. A total of 12 (2.35%), 11 (0.74%), and 1 (1.00%) subsequent cholangiocarcinoma cases were diagnosed among 511 ES/endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation patients, 1485 patients with no intervention, and 100 ES/endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation and cholecystectomy patients, respectively. The incidence rates of recurrent biliary event were 527.79/1000 person-years and 286.69/1000 person-years in the subsequent cholangiocarcinoma and no cholangiocarcinoma group, showing a high correlation between subsequent cholangiocarcinoma risk and recurrent biliary events.

conclusionCholedocholithiasis patients who undergo further cholecystectomy after ES/endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation have decreased subsequent cholangiocarcinoma risk due to reduced recurrent biliary events.

Indexed as

CholangiocarcinomaCholecystectomyEndoscopic papillary balloon dilatationEndoscopic sphincterotomyRecurrent biliary events

Identifiers

PMID33362909
PMCPMC7739153
OpenAlexW3110954079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.