Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33362906›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy2020

Efficacy and safety of peroral endoscopic myotomy after prior sleeve gastrectomy and gastric bypass surgery.

Jennifer M Kolb, Daniel Jonas, Mateus Pereira Funari, Hazem Hammad, Paul Menard-Katcher, Mihir S Wagh

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for achalasia developing after vertical banded gastroplasty with asymptomatic gastro-gastric fistula.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jennifer M KolbDivision of Gastroenterology, University of Colorado-Denver, Aurora, CO 80045, United States.
Daniel JonasDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, CO 80045, United States.
Mateus Pereira FunariGastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São paulo 05403000, São paulo, Brazil.
Hazem HammadDivision of Gastroenterology, University of Colorado-Denver, Aurora, CO 80045, United States.
Paul Menard-KatcherDivision of Gastroenterology, University of Colorado-Denver, Aurora, CO 80045, United States.
Mihir S WaghInterventional Endoscopy, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Colorado-Denver, Aurora, CO 80045, United States. mihir.wagh@cuanschutz.edu.
University of Colorado Denver · USHospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversity of Colorado Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPer-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is safe and effective for the treatment of achalasia. There is limited data on performance of POEM in patients with altered upper gastrointestinal anatomy, especially after bariatric surgery. Outcomes in patients with prior sleeve gastrectomy have not been reported.

aimTo assess the efficacy and safety of POEM in patients with prior bariatric surgery.

methodsA prospective POEM database was reviewed from 3/2017-5/2020 to identify patients who underwent POEM after prior bariatric surgery. Efficacy was assessed by technical success (defined as the ability to successfully complete the procedure) and clinical success [decrease in Eckardt score (ES) to ≤ 3 post procedure]. Safety was evaluated by recording adverse events.

resultsSix patients (50% male, mean age 48 years) with a history of prior bariatric surgery who underwent POEM were included. Three had prior sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and three prior Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). Four patients had achalasia subtype II and 2 had type I. Most (4) patients had undergone previous achalasia therapy. Technical success was 100%. Clinical success was achieved in 4 (67%) patients at mean follow-up of 21 mo. In one of the clinical failures, EndoFLIP evaluation demonstrated adequate treatment and candida esophagitis was noted as the likely cause of dysphagia. There were no major adverse events.

conclusionPOEM is technically feasible after both RYGB and SG and offers an effective treatment for this rare group of patients where surgical options for achalasia are limited.

Indexed as

AchalasiaBariatric surgeryGastric bypassObesityPeroral endoscopic myotomySleeve gastrectomy

Identifiers

PMID33362906
PMCPMC7739145
OpenAlexW3111979687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.