Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33362879›Full record

ReviewDer Gastroenterologe : Zeitschrift fur Gastroenterologie und Hepatologie2021

[Robots in the operating room-(co)operation during surgery].

F Mathis-Ullrich, P M Scheikl

Open access · hybridAbstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Gastroenterologe : Zeitschrift fur Gastroenterologie und Hepatologie, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

F Mathis-UllrichInstitut für Anthropomatik und Robotik (IAR), Health Robotics and Automation Laboratory (HERA), Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT), Engler-Bunte-Ring 8, 76131 Karlsruhe, Deutschland.
P M ScheiklInstitut für Anthropomatik und Robotik (IAR), Health Robotics and Automation Laboratory (HERA), Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT), Engler-Bunte-Ring 8, 76131 Karlsruhe, Deutschland.
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Medical robotics has the potential to improve surgical and endoluminal procedures by enabling high-precision movements and superhuman perception. Objectives: To present historical, existing and future robotic assistants for surgery and to highlight their characteristics and advantages for keyhole surgery and endoscopy. Methods: In particular, historical medical robots and conventional telemanipulators are presented and compared with minimally invasive continuum robots and novel robotic concepts from practice and research. In addition, a perspective for future generations of surgical and endoluminal robots is offered. Conclusion: Robot-assisted medicine offers great added value for quality of intervention as well as safety for surgeons and patients. In the future, more surgical steps will be performed (semi-)autonomously and in cooperation with the experts.

Indexed as

Computer-assisted surgeryEndoscopyMinimally invasive surgeryRobotic surgical proceduresTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID33362879
PMCPMC7753502
OpenAlexW3116298488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.