ArticleBiomedical signal processing and control2020
Ultrasound image processing to estimate the structural and functional properties of mouse skeletal muscle.
Article in Biomedical signal processing and control, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Characterizing Musculoskeletal Tissue Mechanics Based on Shear Wave Propagation: A Systematic Review of Current Methods and Reported Measurements.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2022Pooled it
- Histology-based Microstructural Tissue Phantoms for Realistic Ultrasound Simulation.Ultrasonic imaging · 2026Article
- Three-dimensional dynamic homogenous modeling: The biomechanical influences of leg tissue stiffness on pressure performance of compression biomedical therapeutic textiles.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Noninvasive imaging techniques are increasingly used for monitoring muscle behavior in mice. However, muscle is a complex tissue that exhibits different properties under passive and active conditions. In addition to structural properties, it is also important to analyze functional characteristics. At present, such information can be obtained with ultrasound elastography. However, this technique is poorly used for small rodent models (mice and gerbils). Thus, this study aims at establish referent hindlimb muscle data, and experimental guidelines, for wild-type (WT) control mice as well as the TIEG1 knockout (KO) mouse model that is known to exhibit skeletal muscle defects. Ultrasound was performed with the Aixplorer machine using a SLH 20-6 linear transducer probe (2.8 cm footprint). A region of interest (ROI) was placed around a superficial group of muscles. Subsequently, from the B-mode image, a classification of all the muscles and ultrasound biomarkers such as echo intensity and texture anisotropy have been determined. The influence of the gain setting (from 40% to 70%) was analyzed on these parameters. Moreover, the elasticity (E) was also measured within the ROI. This study provides a suitable methodology for collecting experimental data: 1) the correct range of gain (between 50% and 70%) to apply for the ultrasound measurement of muscle structure, 2) the structural and functional referent data for a group of healthy muscles, 3) the gray scale index, the texture anisotropy and the elasticity (ETIEG1 KO = 36.1 ± 10.3 kPa, E
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.