Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33362814›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2020

Comparing the Flavor Characteristics of 71 Tomato (

Guoting Cheng, Peipei Chang, Yuanbo Shen, Liting Wu, Ahmed H El-Sappah, Fei Zhang, Yan Liang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Phytochemical and Biological Biodiversity of Tomato (Mini reviews in medicinal chemistry · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Use ofFood chemistry: X · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Guoting ChengCollege of Horticulture, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, China.
Peipei ChangInstitute of Agricultural Sciences, Dezhou, China.
Yuanbo ShenCollege of Horticulture, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, China.
Liting WuCollege of Horticulture, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, China.
Ahmed H El-SappahCollege of Horticulture, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, China.
Fei ZhangCollege of Horticulture, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, China.
Yan LiangCollege of Horticulture, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flavor is an important quality of mature tomato fruits. Compared with heirloom tomatoes, modern commercial tomato cultivars are considerably less flavorful. This study aimed to compare the flavor of 71 tomato accessions (8 pink cherry, PC; 11 red cherry, RC; 15 pink large-fruited, PL; and 37 red large-fruited, RL) using hedonism scores and odor activity values. Taste compounds were detected using high-performance liquid chromatography. Volatiles were detected using gas chromatography-olfactometry-mass spectrometry. The flavor of tomato accessions can be evaluated using the DTOPSIS analysis method. According to the results of DTOPSIS analysis, 71 tomato accessions can be divided into 4 classes. Tomato accessions PL11, PC4, PC2, PC8, RL35, RC6, and RC10 had better flavor; accessions PC4, PC8, RC10, RL2, and RL35 had better tomato taste; and accessions PL11, PC2, and RC6 had better tomato odor. The concentrations of total soluble solids, fructose, glucose, and citric acid were shown to positively contribute to tomato taste. Tomato odor was mainly derived from 15 volatiles, namely, 1-hexanol, (

Indexed as

DTOPSIS analysishedonism scoreodor activity valuetaste compoundvolatiles

Identifiers

PMID33362814
PMCPMC7758415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.