Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33362666›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2020

Collective Effervescence, Self-Transcendence, and Gender Differences in Social Well-Being During 8 March Demonstrations.

Larraitz N Zumeta, Pablo Castro-Abril, Lander Méndez, José J Pizarro, Anna Włodarczyk, Nekane Basabe, Ginés Navarro-Carrillo, Sonia Padoan-De Luca, Silvia da Costa, Itziar Alonso-Arbiol and 18 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Shared dysphoric experiences activate identity fusion, but not forever.The British journal of social psychology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Frontiers in psychology · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors at 18 institutions in 10 countries.

Larraitz N ZumetaDepartment of Social Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, San Sebastian/Donostia, Spain.
Pablo Castro-AbrilDepartment of Social Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, San Sebastian/Donostia, Spain.
Lander MéndezDepartment of Social Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, San Sebastian/Donostia, Spain.
José J PizarroDepartment of Social Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, San Sebastian/Donostia, Spain.
Anna WłodarczykSchool of Psychology, Catholic University of North, Antofagasta, Chile.
Nekane BasabeDepartment of Social Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, San Sebastian/Donostia, Spain.
Ginés Navarro-CarrilloDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities and Education Sciences, University of Jaén, Jaén, Spain.
Sonia Padoan-De LucaDepartment of Social Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, San Sebastian/Donostia, Spain.
Silvia da CostaDepartment of Social Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, San Sebastian/Donostia, Spain.
Itziar Alonso-ArbiolDepartment of Clinical and Health Psychology and Research Methods, Faculty of Psychology, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU (for its Spanish/Basque initials), San Sebastian/Donostia, Spain.
Bárbara Torres-GómezDepartment of Clinical and Health Psychology and Research Methods, Faculty of Psychology, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU (for its Spanish/Basque initials), San Sebastian/Donostia, Spain.
Huseyin CakalSchool of Psychology, Keele University, Staffordshire, United Kingdom.
Gisela DelfinoCentre of Research in Psychology and Psychopedagogy, Pontifical Catholic University of Argentina, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Elza M TechioLaboratory for the Study of Psychological and Social Processes (LEPPS), Institute of Psychology, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador de Bahía, Brazil.
Carolina AlzugaraySchool of Psychology, Santo Tomas University, Concepción, Chile.
Marian BilbaoFaculty of Psychology, Alberto Hurtado University, Santiago, Chile.
Loreto VillagránDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Concepcion University, Concepción, Chile.
Wilson López-LópezDepartment of Psychology, Pontifical Xavierian University, Bogota, Colombia.
José Ignacio Ruiz-PérezDepartment of Psychology, National University of Colombia, Bogota, Colombia.
Cynthia C CedeñoFaculty of Psychology, Salesian Polytechnic University, Quito, Ecuador.
Carlos Reyes-ValenzuelaAndean Human Rights Program, Andean Simón Bolivar University, Quito, Ecuador.
Laura Alfaro-BeracoecheaDepartment of Communication and Psychology, University Centre of Ciénega, University of Guadalajara, Ocotlán, Mexico.
Carlos Contreras-IbáñezLaboratory of Social Cognition, Department of Sociology, Autonomous Metropolitan University, Iztapalapa, Mexico.
Manuel Leonardo IbarraUniversity Campus in Nezahualcóyotl, Autonomous University of the State of Mexico, Nezahualcóyotl, Mexico.
Hiram Reyes-SosaDepartment of Social Psychology, Autonomous University of Coahuila, Saltillo, Mexico.
Rosa María CuetoDepartment of Psychology, Pontifical Catholic University of Peru, Lima, Peru.
Catarina L CarvalhoLaboratory of Social Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Isabel R PintoLaboratory of Social Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
University of the Basque Country · ESUniversidade do Porto · PTAlberto Hurtado University · CLKeele University · GBPontifical Catholic University of Peru · PEPontificia Universidad Católica Argentina · ARPontificia Universidad Javeriana · COUniversidad Andina Simón Bolívar · ECUniversidad Autónoma de Coahuila · MXUniversidad Autónoma Metropolitana · MXUniversidad Católica del Norte · CLUniversidad de Guadalajara · MXUniversidad de Jaén · ESUniversidade Federal da Bahia · BRUniversidad Nacional de Colombia · COUniversidad Santo Tomás · CLUniversidad Tecnológica de Nezahualcóyotl · MXUniversity of Concepción · CL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

8 March (8M), now known as International Women's Day, is a day for feminist claims where demonstrations are organized in over 150 countries, with the participation of millions of women all around the world. These demonstrations can be viewed as collective rituals and thus focus attention on the processes that facilitate different psychosocial effects. This work aims to explore the mechanisms (i.e., behavioral and attentional synchrony, perceived emotional synchrony, and positive and transcendent emotions) involved in participation in the demonstrations of 8 March 2020, collective and ritualized feminist actions, and their correlates associated with personal well-being (i.e., affective well-being and beliefs of personal growth) and collective well-being (i.e., social integration variables: situated identity, solidarity and fusion), collective efficacy and collective growth, and behavioral intention to support the fight for women's rights. To this end, a cross-cultural study was conducted with the participation of 2,854 people (age 18-79;

Indexed as

8M demonstrationscollective effervescencefeminist demonstrationsgender differencesparticipation in collective ritualsperceived emotional synchronyself-transcendencewell-being

Identifiers

PMID33362666
PMCPMC7759529
OpenAlexW3110650324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.