Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33362654›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychology2020

Stress Reduction Techniques for Health Care Providers Dealing With Severe Coronavirus Infections (SARS, MERS, and COVID-19): A Rapid Review.

Edward Callus, Barbara Bassola, Valentina Fiolo, Enrico G Bertoldo, Silvana Pagliuca, Maura Lusignani

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The Psychological Impact of COVID-19 on Front Line Nurses: A Synthesis of Qualitative Evidence.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Stigmatization from Work-Related COVID-19 Exposure: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Edward CallusClinical Psychology Service, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Italy.
Barbara BassolaNursing School, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy.
Valentina FioloClinical Psychology Service, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Italy.
Enrico G BertoldoClinical Psychology Service, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Italy.
Silvana PagliucaClinical Psychology Service, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Italy.
Maura LusignaniDepartment of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
IRCCS Policlinico San Donato · ITAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda · ITUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveA rapid review was conducted to identify the most effective stress reduction techniques for health care providers dealing with patients infected with severe coronavirus (SARS, MERS, and COVID-19).

methodsPubMed, PsychInfo, Embase, and CINAHL databases were searched to identify relevant studies. Searches were restricted by date (2000 until present). All empirical quantitative and qualitative studies in which relaxation techniques of various types implemented on health care providers caring for patients during severe coronavirus pandemics and articles that consider the implementation of mental health care services considered to be pertinent, such as commentaries, were included.

resultsFourteen studies met the selection criteria, most of which were recommendations. Only one study described a digital intervention, and user satisfaction was measured. In the recommendations, both organizational and individual self-care interventions were suggested.

conclusionsFurther research is necessary to establish tailor-made effective stress reduction interventions for this population, during these challenging and particular times.

Indexed as

coronavirusCOVID-19health care workerspsychological interventionreviewstress reduction techniques

Identifiers

PMID33362654
PMCPMC7758192
OpenAlexW3110743244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.