Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33362277›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2020

Neurological outcome after minimally invasive coronary artery bypass surgery (NOMICS): An observational prospective cohort study.

Björn Stessel, Kristof Nijs, Caroline Pelckmans, Jeroen Vandenbrande, Jean-Paul Ory, Alaaddin Yilmaz, Pascal Starinieri, Michiel Van Tornout, Nina De Klippel, Paul Dendale

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02979782 (Neurological Outcome After Minimal Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Graft), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02979782 completednot on this map

Neurological Outcome After Minimal Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Graft: a Single-centre Prospective Cohort Study

TypeobservationalSponsorJessa HospitalRan2016 to 2018Enrolled180ConditionsPostoperative Cognitive Dysfunction, Cerebrovascular Accident, DeliriumArmsEndo-CABG, PCI
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Neuroprotective Strategies in Coronary Artery Disease Interventions.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025
    Review
  2. Totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting: experience in 1500 patients.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Year in Review 2021: Noteworthy Literature in Cardiothoracic Anesthesia.Seminars in cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Björn StesselDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-1422-2777
Kristof NijsDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-5627-0665
Caroline PelckmansDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium.
Jeroen VandenbrandeDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium.
Jean-Paul OryDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium.
Alaaddin YilmazDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium.
Pascal StarinieriDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium.
Michiel Van TornoutDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium.
Nina De KlippelDepartment of Neurology, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium.
Paul DendaleFaculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, LCRC, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesEndoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting (Endo-CABG) is a minimally invasive CABG procedure with retrograde arterial perfusion. The main objective of this study is to assess neurocognitive outcome after Endo-CABG. METHODS/

designIn this prospective observational cohort study, patients were categorised into: Endo-CABG (n = 60), a comparative Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) group (n = 60) and a healthy volunteer group (n = 60). A clinical neurological examination was performed both pre- and postoperatively, delirium was assessed postoperatively. A battery of 6 neurocognitive tests, Quality of life (QoL) and the level of depressive feelings were measured at baseline and after 3 months. Patient Satisfaction after Endo-CABG was assessed at 3-month follow-up. Primary endpoints were incidence of postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD), stroke and delirium after Endo-CABG. Secondary endpoints were QOL, patient satisfaction and the incidence of depressive feelings after Endo-CABG.

resultsIn total, 1 patient after Endo-CABG (1.72%) and 1 patient after PCI (1.67%) suffered from stroke during the 3-month follow-up. POCD in a patient is defined as a Reliable Change Index ≤-1.645 or Z-score ≤-1.645 in at least two tests, and was found in respectively 5 and 6 patients 3 months after Endo-CABG and PCI. Total incidence of POCD/stroke was not different (PCI: n= 7 [15.9%]; Endo-CABG: n= 6 [13.0%], p = 0.732). ICU delirium after Endo-CABG was found in 5 (8.6%) patients. QoL increased significantly three months after Endo-CABG and was comparable with QoL level after PCI and in the control group. Patient satisfaction after Endo-CABG and PCI was comparable. At follow-up, the level of depressive feelings was decreased in all groups.

conclusionsThe incidence of poor neurocognitive outcome, including stroke, POCD and postoperative ICU delirium until three months after Endo-CABG is low and comparable with PCI.

trial registrationRegistered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02979782).

Indexed as

AgedCase-Control StudiesCoronary Artery BypassCoronary Artery DiseaseDeliriumDepressionFemaleHumansMaleMental Status and Dementia TestsMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionPercutaneous Coronary InterventionProspective StudiesQuality of LifeStroke

Identifiers

PMID33362277
PMCPMC7757846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.