Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33362255›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2020

Is consumer neural response to visual merchandising types different depending on their fashion involvement?

Hyoung-Sukh Kim, Jin-Hwa Lee, So-Hyeon Yoo

Erratum issuedAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hyoung-Sukh KimCollege of Design, Dongseo University, Busan, Korea.
Jin-Hwa LeeDepartment of Clothing & Textiles, College of Human Ecology, Pusan National University, Busan, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-2431-6029
So-Hyeon YooSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Pusan National University, Busan, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8528-4457

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated consumers' responses to fashion visual merchandising (VM) from a neuroscientific perspective. The brain activations of 20 subjects differently involved in fashion were recorded using functional near-infrared spectroscopy in response to three different fashion VM types. According to the types of fashion VM, significant differences were observed, which were significantly higher for the creative VM. Moreover, highly fashion-involved subjects showed activation of the orbital frontal cortex region in response to the creative VM. Based on these results, it is suggested that marketing strategies should be devised explicitly for the brand's targeted audience and goals.

Indexed as

Consumer BehaviorAdultBrain MappingCreativityDecision MakingEmotionsFemaleFrontal LobeHealthy VolunteersHumansImpulsive BehaviorMarketingPhotic StimulationSpectroscopy, Near-InfraredVisual Perception

Identifiers

PMID33362255
PMCPMC7757867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.