Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33362252›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2020

Assessment of the sublingual microcirculation with the GlycoCheck system: Reproducibility and examination conditions.

Mie Klessen Eickhoff, Signe Abitz Winther, Tine Willum Hansen, Lars Jorge Diaz, Frederik Persson, Peter Rossing, Marie Frimodt-Møller

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Biomarkers of endothelial glycocalyx dysfunction in pregnancy: a systematic review of clinical relevance and detection techniques.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Glycosaminoglycans and Their Role in Capillary Walls.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Sugar-coating the endothelium: adaptive or maladaptive?American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mie Klessen EickhoffSteno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Gentofte, Denmark.
Signe Abitz WintherSteno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Gentofte, Denmark.
Tine Willum HansenSteno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Gentofte, Denmark.
Lars Jorge DiazSteno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Gentofte, Denmark.
Frederik PerssonSteno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Gentofte, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-6242-6638
Peter RossingSteno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Gentofte, Denmark.
Marie Frimodt-MøllerSteno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Gentofte, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-8486-1515
Steno Diabetes Centers · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe glycocalyx is an extracellular layer lining the lumen of the vascular endothelium, protecting the endothelium from shear stress and atherosclerosis and contributes to coagulation, immune response and microvascular perfusion. The GlycoCheck system estimates glycocalyx' thickness in vessels under the tongue from perfused boundary region (PBR) and microvascular perfusion (red blood cell (RBC) filling) via a camera and dedicated software.

objectivesEvaluating reproducibility and influence of examination conditions on measurements with the GlycoCheck system.

methodsOpen, randomised, controlled study including 42 healthy smokers investigating day-to-day, side-of-tongue, inter-investigator variance, intraclass-correlation (ICC) and influence of examination conditions at intervals from 0-180 minutes on PBR and RBC filling.

resultsMean (SD) age was 24.9 (6.1) years, 52% were male. There was no significant intra- or inter-investigator variation for PBR or RBC filling nor for PBR for side-of-tongue. A small day-to-day variance was found for PBR (0.012μm, p = 0.007) and RBC filling (0.003%, p = 0.005) and side-of-tongue, RBC filling (0.025%, p = 0.009). ICC was modest but highly improved by increasing measurements. Small significant influence of cigarette smoking (from 40-180 minutes), high calorie meal intake and coffee consumption was found. The latter two peaking immediately and tapering off but remained significant up to 180 minutes, highest PBR changes for the three being 0.042μm (p<0.05), 0.183μm (p<0.001) and 0.160μm (p<0.05) respectively.

conclusionsMeasurements with the GlycoCheck system have a moderate reproducibility, but highly increases with multiple measurements and a small day-to-day variability. Smoking, meal and coffee intake had effects up to 180 minutes, abstinence is recommended at least 180 minutes before GlycoCheck measurements. Future studies should standardise conditions during measurements.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultCardiovascular DiseasesDiagnostic Techniques, CardiovascularEndothelium, VascularErythrocytesFemaleGlycocalyxHumansMaleMicrocirculationMicrovesselsMouth FloorReproducibility of ResultsSmokersSoftware

Identifiers

PMID33362252
PMCPMC7757800
OpenAlexW3115988773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.