Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33362244›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2020

Assessing the risk of dengue severity using demographic information and laboratory test results with machine learning.

Sheng-Wen Huang, Huey-Pin Tsai, Su-Jhen Hung, Wen-Chien Ko, Jen-Ren Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prognostic Models in Patients with Dengue: A Systematic Review.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Clinical characteristics, complications and outcomes of critically ill patients with Dengue in Brazil, 2012-2024: A nationwide, multicenter cohort study.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sheng-Wen HuangNational Mosquito-Borne Diseases Control Research Center, National Health Research Institutes, Tainan, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-9127-7616
Huey-Pin TsaiDepartment of Pathology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, and College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Su-Jhen HungNational Mosquito-Borne Diseases Control Research Center, National Health Research Institutes, Tainan, Taiwan.
Wen-Chien KoDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, and College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-7497-149X
Jen-Ren WangDepartment of Pathology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, and College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
National Health Research Institutes · TWNational Cheng Kung University Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDengue virus causes a wide spectrum of disease, which ranges from subclinical disease to severe dengue shock syndrome. However, estimating the risk of severe outcomes using clinical presentation or laboratory test results for rapid patient triage remains a challenge. Here, we aimed to develop prognostic models for severe dengue using machine learning, according to demographic information and clinical laboratory data of patients with dengue. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsOut of 1,581 patients in the National Cheng Kung University Hospital with suspected dengue infections and subjected to NS1 antigen, IgM and IgG, and qRT-PCR tests, 798 patients including 138 severe cases were enrolled in the study. The primary target outcome was severe dengue. Machine learning models were trained and tested using the patient dataset that included demographic information and qualitative laboratory test results collected on day 1 when they sought medical advice. To develop prognostic models, we applied various machine learning methods, including logistic regression, random forest, gradient boosting machine, support vector classifier, and artificial neural network, and compared the performance of the methods. The artificial neural network showed the highest average discrimination area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.8324 ± 0.0268) and balance accuracy (0.7523 ± 0.0273). According to the model explainer that analyzed the contributions/co-contributions of the different factors, patient age and dengue NS1 antigenemia were the two most important risk factors associated with severe dengue. Additionally, co-existence of anti-dengue IgM and IgG in patients with dengue increased the probability of severe dengue. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: We developed prognostic models for the prediction of dengue severity in patients, using machine learning. The discriminative ability of the artificial neural network exhibited good performance for severe dengue prognosis. This model could help clinicians obtain a rapid prognosis during dengue outbreaks. However, the model requires further validation using external cohorts in future studies.

Indexed as

Machine LearningDemographyDengueDiagnostic Tests, RoutineFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedNeural Networks, ComputerPrognosisRisk FactorsROC Curve

Identifiers

PMID33362244
PMCPMC7757819
OpenAlexW3113628481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.