Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33362236›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Evaluation of community based surveillance in the Rohingya refugee camps in Cox's Bazar, Bangladesh, 2019.

Elburg Van Boetzelaer, Samiur Chowdhury, Berhe Etsay, Abu Faruque, Annick Lenglet, Anna Kuehne, Isidro Carrion-Martin, Patrick Keating, Martins Dada, Jorieke Vyncke and 2 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Elburg Van BoetzelaerMédecins Sans Frontières, Cox's Bazar, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0002-1168-8491
Samiur ChowdhuryMédecins Sans Frontières, Cox's Bazar, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Berhe EtsayMédecins Sans Frontières, Cox's Bazar, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Abu FaruqueInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Annick LengletMédecins Sans Frontières, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2013-8405
Anna KuehneMédecins Sans Frontières, London, United Kingdom.
Isidro Carrion-MartinMédecins Sans Frontières, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8845-3447
Patrick KeatingMédecins Sans Frontières, London, United Kingdom.
Martins DadaMédecins Sans Frontières, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jorieke VynckeMédecins Sans Frontières, London, United Kingdom.
Donald Sonne KazunguMédecins Sans Frontières, Cox's Bazar, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Maria VerdecchiaMédecins Sans Frontières, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0047-149X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFollowing an influx of an estimated 742,000 Rohingya refugees in Bangladesh, Médecins sans Frontières (MSF) established an active indicator-based Community Based Surveillance (CBS) in 13 sub-camps in Cox's Bazar in August 2017. Its objective was to detect epidemic prone diseases early for rapid response. We describe the surveillance, alert and response in place from epidemiological week 20 (12 May 2019) until 44 (2 November 2019).

methodsSuspected cases were identified through passive health facility surveillance and active indicator-based CBS. CBS-teams conducted active case finding for suspected cases of acute watery diarrhea (AWD), acute jaundice syndrome (AJS), acute flaccid paralysis (AFP), dengue, diphtheria, measles and meningitis. We evaluate the following surveillance system attributes: usefulness, Positive Predictive Value (PPV), timeliness, simplicity, flexibility, acceptability, representativeness and stability.

resultsBetween epidemiological weeks 20 and 44, an average of 97,340 households were included in the CBS per surveillance cycle. Household coverage reached over 85%. Twenty-one RDT positive cholera cases and two clusters of AWD were identified by the CBS and health facility surveillance that triggered the response mechanism within 12 hours. The PPV of the CBS varied per disease between 41.7%-100%. The CBS required 354 full-time staff in 10 different roles. The CBS was sufficiently flexible to integrate dengue surveillance. The CBS was representative of the population in the catchment area due to its exhaustive character and high household coverage. All households consented to CBS participation, showing acceptability. DISCUSSION: The CBS allowed for timely response but was resource intensive. Disease trends identified by the health facility surveillance and suspected diseases trends identified by CBS were similar, which might indicate limited additional value of the CBS in a dense and stable setting such as Cox's Bazar. Instead, a passive community-event-based surveillance mechanism combined with health facility-based surveillance could be more appropriate.

Indexed as

Health Status IndicatorsBangladeshDengueDiarrheaDisease OutbreaksHumansMeaslesMeningitisMyanmarPublic Health SurveillanceRefugee CampsRefugeesSocieties, Medical

Identifiers

PMID33362236
PMCPMC7757896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.