Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33362197›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Genomic and morphological evidence of distinct populations in the endemic common (weedy) seadragon Phyllopteryx taeniolatus (Syngnathidae) along the east coast of Australia.

O Selma Klanten, Michelle R Gaither, Samuel Greaves, Kade Mills, Kristine O'Keeffe, John Turnbull, Rob McKinnon, David J Booth

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Leafy and weedy seadragon genomes connect genic and repetitive DNA features to the extravagant biology of syngnathid fishes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

O Selma KlantenFish Ecology Lab, School of Life Sciences, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6296-4225
Michelle R GaitherDepartment of Biology, Genomics and Bioinformatics Cluster, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, United States of America.
Samuel GreavesDepartment of Biology, Genomics and Bioinformatics Cluster, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, United States of America.
Kade MillsVictorian National Parks Association, Carlton Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Kristine O'KeeffeUnderwater Research Group (URG), Sydney, NSW, Australia.
John TurnbullUnderwater Research Group (URG), Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Rob McKinnonNew South Wales National Parks and Wildlife Service, Merimbula, NSW, Australia.
David J BoothFish Ecology Lab, School of Life Sciences, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8256-1412
University of Central Florida · USUniversity of Technology Sydney · AUNational Parks and Wildlife Service · AUParks Victoria · AUUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The common or weedy seadragon, Phyllopteryx taeniolatus, is an iconic and endemic fish found across temperate reefs of southern Australia. Despite its charismatic nature, few studies have been published, and the extent of population sub-structuring remains poorly resolved. Here we used 7462 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) to identify the extent of population structure in the weedy seadragon along the temperate southeast coast of Australia. We identified four populations, with strong genetic structure (FST = 0.562) between them. Both Discriminant Analysis of Principle Components (DAPC) and Bayesian clustering analyses support four distinct genetic clusters (north to south: central New South Wales, southern NSW, Victoria and Tasmania). In addition to these genetic differences, geographical variation in external morphology was recorded, with individuals from New South Wales shaped differently for a few measurements to those from the Mornington Peninsula (Victoria). We posit that these genetic and morphological differences suggest that the Victorian population of P. taeniolatus was historically isolated by the Bassian Isthmus during the last glacial maximum and should now be considered at least a distinct population. We also recorded high levels of genetic structure among the other locations. Based on the genomic and to a degree morphological evidence presented in this study, we recommend that the Victorian population be managed separately from the eastern populations (New South Wales and Tasmania).

Indexed as

Genetic VariationAnimalsBayes TheoremDiscriminant AnalysisGenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotidePrincipal Component AnalysisSmegmamorphaSouth Australia

Identifiers

PMID33362197
PMCPMC7757807
OpenAlexW3115796370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.