ArticleJournal of virology2021
Effect of Difference in Consensus Sequence between HIV-1 Subtype A/E and Subtype B Viruses on Elicitation of Gag-Specific CD8
Article in Journal of virology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multistep coevolution of HIV-1 and human leukocyte antigen-C-restricted HIV-1-specific CD8PNAS nexus · 2026Article
- Exploring the Vasculitis-Tumors Link: Epidemiological Patterns, Mechanistic Insights, and Clinical Implications.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Molecular basis for selection and inhibition of HIV-1 escape virus by T cells and KIR2DL2Nature communications · 2025Article
- Control of HIV-1 Replication by CD8Journal of virology · 2022Article
- HIV Capsid Protein Genetic Diversity Across HIV-1 Variants and Impact on New Capsid-Inhibitor Lenacapavir.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Genetic Diversity and Low Therapeutic Impact of Variant-Specific Markers in HIV-1 Pol Proteins.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Gag280 mutation is associated with HLA-C*01:02 but not with HLA-B*52:01 in subtype A/E-infected individuals, whereas this mutation is associated with HLA-B*52:01 but not with HLA-C*01:02 in subtype B infections. Although it is known that the Gag280 mutant is selected by HLA-B*52:01-restricted GagRI8 (Gag275-282)-specific T cells in subtype B infections, it remains unknown why this Gag280 mutation is associated with HLA-C*01:02 rather than HLA-B*52:01 in subtype A/E infections. The subtype B and A/E viruses have different consensus sequence, with Thr and Val at Gag280, respectively. To clarify the effect of this difference in Gag280 consensus sequence, we investigated the role of HLA-C*01:02-restricted GagYI9 (Gag277-285)-specific T cells in selection of Gag280 mutations in subtype A/E-infected Vietnamese and subtype B-infected Japanese individuals. GagYI9-4V-specific T cells, which were frequently elicited in Vietnamese individuals infected with the consensus-type A/E virus, failed to recognize GagV280T mutant A/E virus-infected cells. GagYI9-4T mutant epitope-specific T cells, which were weakly elicited in individuals infected with the mutant A/E virus, had weak or no ability to recognize the mutant virus. These results account for the mechanism for selection and accumulation of GagV280T mutants in the case of subtype A/E infections. In contrast, HLA-C*01:02-restricted GagYI9-4T-specific T cells were weakly elicited in Japanese individuals infected with the subtype B virus, explaining why HLA-C*01:02-restricted Gag280 mutations are not accumulated in the case of a subtype B infection. The present study demonstrated that a difference in the Gag280 consensus sequence influenced the elicitation of the GagYI9-specific T cells involved in the accumulation of HLA-C*01:02-associated Gag280 mutations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.