Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33361309›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2021

Model-Optimized Fluconazole Dose Selection for Critically Ill Patients Improves Early Pharmacodynamic Target Attainment without the Need for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring.

Indy Sandaradura, Jessica Wojciechowski, Deborah J E Marriott, Richard O Day, Sophie Stocker, Stephanie E Reuter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Indy SandaraduraCentre for Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia indy.sandaradura@health.nsw.gov.au.ORCID 0000-0002-9457-8262
Jessica WojciechowskiGlobal Product Development, Pfizer, Inc., Groton, Connecticut, USA.
Deborah J E MarriottDepartment of Microbiology, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Richard O DaySt Vincent's Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Sophie StockerSt Vincent's Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2114-587X
Stephanie E ReuterUniSA Clinical & Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fluconazole has been associated with higher mortality compared with the echinocandins in patients treated for invasive candida infections. Underexposure from current fluconazole dosing regimens may contribute to these worse outcomes, so alternative dosing strategies require study. The objective of this study was to evaluate fluconazole drug exposure in critically ill patients comparing a novel model-optimized dose selection method with established approaches over a standard 14-day (336-h) treatment course. Target attainment was evaluated in a representative population of 1,000 critically ill adult patients for (i) guideline dosing (800-mg loading and 400-mg maintenance dosing adjusted to renal function), (ii) guideline dosing followed by therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)-guided dose adjustment, and (iii) model-optimized dose selection based on patient factors (without TDM). Assuming a MIC of 2 mg/liter, free fluconazole 24-h area under the curve (fAUC

Indexed as

Candidiasis, InvasiveFluconazoleAdultCritical IllnessDrug MonitoringEchinocandinsHumansEchinocandinsFluconazolecritical illnessdose optimizationfluconazolepharmacometricstherapeutic drug monitoring

Identifiers

PMID33361309
PMCPMC8092533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.