Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33361236›Full record

ArticleGlobal health, science and practice2020

Remote Mentorship Using Video Conferencing as an Effective Tool to Strengthen Laboratory Quality Management in Clinical Laboratories: Lessons From Cambodia.

Grant Donovan, Siew Kim Ong, Sophanna Song, Nayah Ndefru, Chhayheng Leang, Sophat Sek, Patricia Sadate-Ngatchou, Lucy A Perrone

Erratum issuedOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global health, science and practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Grant DonovanDepartment of Global Health, Schools of Public Health and Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Siew Kim OngInternational Training and Education Center for Health, Cambodia, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Sophanna SongInternational Training and Education Center for Health, Cambodia, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Nayah NdefruInternational Training and Education Center for Health, Department of Global Health, Schools of Public Health and Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Chhayheng LeangInternational Training and Education Center for Health, Cambodia, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Sophat SekInternational Training and Education Center for Health, Cambodia, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Patricia Sadate-NgatchouDepartment of Global Health, Schools of Public Health and Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Lucy A PerroneInternational Training and Education Center for Health, Department of Global Health, Schools of Public Health and Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. perronel@uw.edu.
University of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProviding professional development opportunities to staff working in clinical laboratories undergoing quality improvement programs can be challenged by limited funding, particularly in resource-limited countries such as Cambodia. Using innovative approaches such as video conferencing can connect mentors with practitioners regardless of location. This study describes and evaluates the methods, outputs, and outcomes of a quality improvement program implemented in 12 public hospital laboratories in Cambodia between January 2018 and April 2019. The program used mixed intervention methods including both in-person and remote-access training and mentorship.

methodsTraining outputs were quantified from the activity reports of program trainers and mentors. Program outcomes were measured by pre- and postimplementation audits of laboratory quality management system conformity to international standards. Variations in improved outcomes were assessed in relation to the time spent by laboratory personnel in video conference training and mentoring activity. An additional cross-sectional comparison described the difference in final audit scores between participating and nonparticipating laboratories.

resultsLaboratories significantly improved their audit scores over the project period, showing significant improvement in all sections of the ISO 15189 standard. Pre- and postaudit score differences and laboratory personnel participation time in remote mentoring activities showed a strong monotonic relationship. Average input per laboratory was 6,027±2,454 minutes of participation in video conference activities with mentors. Audit scores of participating laboratories were significantly higher than those of laboratories with no quality improvement program.

conclusionLaboratories improved significantly in ISO 15189 conformity following structured laboratory quality management systems training supported by remote and on-site mentoring. The correlation of laboratory participation in video conference activities highlights the utility of remote video conferencing technology to strengthen laboratories in resource-limited settings and to build communities of practice to address quality improvement issues in health care. These findings are particularly relevant in light of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

CambodiaCross-Sectional StudiesHumansLaboratoriesMentoringQuality ImprovementStaff DevelopmentUnited StatesVideoconferencing

Identifiers

PMID33361236
PMCPMC7784067
OpenAlexW3111013422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.