ReviewThe Journal of biological chemistry
αα-Hub domains and intrinsically disordered proteins: A decisive combo.
Review in The Journal of biological chemistry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- The protein corona at the nano-bio interface: the need for standardized methodology and opportunities for neurodegenerative disease intervention.RSC advances · 2026Review
- Strategies for constructing context-specific protein-protein interaction networks.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Stability and interaction defects in the Sin3A-PAH1 αα-hub domain associated with loss-of-function variants.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2026Article
- Differential control of both cell cycle-regulated and quantitative histone mRNA expression bybioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Screening for GmRCD1-Interacting Proteins in Glycine Max and Characterization of the GmRCD1-GmNAC058 Interaction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Extreme multivalency and a composite short linear motif facilitate PCNA-binding, localisation and abundance of p21 (CDKN1A).The FEBS journal · 2025Article
- Allovalent scavenging of activation domains in the transcription factor ANAC013 gears transcriptional regulation.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- The role of intrinsically disordered regions of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid and non-structural protein 1 proteins.Frontiers in chemistry · 2025Review
- Harmonin homology domain-mediated interaction of RTEL1 helicase with RPA and DNA provides insights into its recruitment to DNA repair sites.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
- Molecular switching in transcription through splicing and proline-isomerization regulates stress responses in plants.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Evolutionary fine-tuning of residual helix structure in disordered proteins manifests in complex structure and lifetime.Communications biology · 2023Article
- The biophysics of disordered proteins from the point of view of single-molecule fluorescence spectroscopy.Essays in biochemistry · 2022Article
- Enrichment patterns of intrinsic disorder in proteins.Biophysical reviews · 2022Review
- αα-hub coregulator structure and flexibility determine transcription factor binding and selection in regulatory interactomes.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2022Article
- Dilute phase oligomerization can oppose phase separation and modulate material properties of a ribonucleoprotein condensate.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hub proteins are central nodes in protein-protein interaction networks with critical importance to all living organisms. Recently, a new group of folded hub domains, the αα-hubs, was defined based on a shared αα-hairpin supersecondary structural foundation. The members PAH, RST, TAFH, NCBD, and HHD are found in large proteins such as Sin3, RCD1, TAF4, CBP, and harmonin, which organize disordered transcriptional regulators and membrane scaffolds in interactomes of importance to human diseases and plant quality. In this review, studies of structures, functions, and complexes across the αα-hubs are described and compared to provide a unified description of the group. This analysis expands the associated molecular concepts of "one domain-one binding site", motif-based ligand binding, and coupled folding and binding of intrinsically disordered ligands to additional concepts of importance to signal fidelity. These include context, motif reversibility, multivalency, complex heterogeneity, synergistic αα-hub:ligand folding, accessory binding sites, and supramodules. We propose that these multifaceted protein-protein interaction properties are made possible by the characteristics of the αα-hub fold, including supersite properties, dynamics, variable topologies, accessory helices, and malleability and abetted by adaptability of the disordered ligands. Critically, these features provide additional filters for specificity. With the presentations of new concepts, this review opens for new research questions addressing properties across the group, which are driven from concepts discovered in studies of the individual members. Combined, the members of the αα-hubs are ideal models for deconvoluting signal fidelity maintained by folded hubs and their interactions with intrinsically disordered ligands.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.