Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33361155›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry

Molecular dynamics approach to identification of new OGG1 cancer-associated somatic variants with impaired activity.

Aleksandr V Popov, Anton V Endutkin, Darya D Yatsenko, Anna V Yudkina, Alexander E Barmatov, Kristina A Makasheva, Darya Yu Raspopova, Evgeniia A Diatlova, Dmitry O Zharkov

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. DNA damage twists base choreography.Nature chemical biology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Aleksandr V PopovLaboratory of Genome and Protein Engineering, SB RAS Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, Novosibirsk, Russia. Electronic address: apopov@niboch.nsc.ru.
Anton V EndutkinLaboratory of Genome and Protein Engineering, SB RAS Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Darya D YatsenkoLaboratory of Genome and Protein Engineering, SB RAS Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, Novosibirsk, Russia; Department of Natural Sciences, Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Anna V YudkinaLaboratory of Genome and Protein Engineering, SB RAS Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Alexander E BarmatovLaboratory of Genome and Protein Engineering, SB RAS Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Kristina A MakashevaDepartment of Natural Sciences, Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Darya Yu RaspopovaDepartment of Natural Sciences, Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Evgeniia A DiatlovaLaboratory of Genome and Protein Engineering, SB RAS Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Dmitry O ZharkovLaboratory of Genome and Protein Engineering, SB RAS Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, Novosibirsk, Russia; Department of Natural Sciences, Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk, Russia. Electronic address: dzharkov@niboch.nsc.ru.
Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine · RUNovosibirsk State University · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA of living cells is always exposed to damaging factors. To counteract the consequences of DNA lesions, cells have evolved several DNA repair systems, among which base excision repair is one of the most important systems. Many currently used antitumor drugs act by damaging DNA, and DNA repair often interferes with chemotherapy and radiotherapy in cancer cells. Tumors are usually extremely genetically heterogeneous, often bearing mutations in DNA repair genes. Thus, knowledge of the functionality of cancer-related variants of proteins involved in DNA damage response and repair is of great interest for personalization of cancer therapy. Although computational methods to predict the variant functionality have attracted much attention, at present, they are mostly based on sequence conservation and make little use of modern capabilities in computational analysis of 3D protein structures. We have used molecular dynamics (MD) to model the structures of 20 clinically observed variants of a DNA repair enzyme, 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase. In parallel, we have experimentally characterized the activity, thermostability, and DNA binding in a subset of these mutant proteins. Among the analyzed variants of 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase, three (I145M, G202C, and V267M) were significantly functionally impaired and were successfully predicted by MD. Alone or in combination with sequence-based methods, MD may be an important functional prediction tool for cancer-related protein variants of unknown significance.

Indexed as

DNA RepairMutationAmino Acid SubstitutionBinding SitesDNA DamageDNA GlycosylasesDNA, NeoplasmGene ExpressionGuanineHumansKineticsLeukemiaLung NeoplasmsMolecular Dynamics SimulationNeoplasm ProteinsPrincipal Component Analysis8-hydroxyguanineDNA GlycosylasesDNA, NeoplasmGuanineNeoplasm Proteinsoxoguanine glycosylase 1, humanDNA damageDNA glycosylasesDNA repairgenetic polymorphismmolecular dynamicsOGG1personalized medicineprotein function predictionstructure–function

Identifiers

PMID33361155
PMCPMC7948927
OpenAlexW3114269557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.