Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33361046›Full record

ArticleThe Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology2020

Clinical report and analysis of 24 cases of multiple magnetic beads foreign body in gastrointestinal tract of children.

Xian-Ling Li, Qin-Ming Zhang, Shou-Yan Lu, Ting-Ting Liu, Zi-Ming Yao, Wei-Ping Zhang, Ya-Jun Chen, Long Chen, Fang-Nan Xie

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Xian-Ling LiDepartment of Surgery, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, China.
Qin-Ming ZhangDepartment of Surgery, Beijing United Family Hospital, Beijing, China.
Shou-Yan LuDepartment of Surgery, Beijing Aiyuhua Women's and Children's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Ting-Ting LiuDepartment of Surgery, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, China.
Zi-Ming YaoDepartment of Surgery, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, China.
Wei-Ping ZhangDepartment of Surgery, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, China.
Ya-Jun ChenDepartment of Surgery, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, China.
Long ChenDepartment of Surgery, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, China.
Fang-Nan XieDepartment of Surgery, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, China.
Capital Medical University · CNBeijing United Family Hospital · CNChina Women's University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimsThis study aimed to analyze the data of 24 cases of multiple perforation or obstruction of the digestive tract caused by accidental ingestion of magnetic beads, to improve the understanding of its harmfulness to children and explore the best treatment. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn total, 24 cases were collected and retrospectively analyzed. These patients were divided into two groups: perforation group and non-perforation group. The medical history, number of magnetic beads, white blood cell (WBC) count, and C-reactive protein (CRP) were analyzed.

resultsThere was no significant difference in age, gender, medical history, number of magnetic beads, and WBC count between the perforation group and non-perforation group, but there was a significant difference in CRP. After the diagnosis, 70% of the cases underwent laparotomy and perforation repair. All cases recovered smoothly after the operation, and no complications occurred during the follow-up.

conclusionThis study offers diagnosis and treatment methods for the perforation or obstruction of the digestive tract caused by accidental ingestion of magnetic beads and raises the awareness regarding the harmfulness of the presence of foreign bodies in the digestive tract.

Indexed as

Child, PreschoolC-Reactive ProteinFemaleForeign BodiesGastrointestinal TractHumansIntestinal PerforationLaparotomyLeukocyte CountMagnetsMaleRetrospective StudiesC-Reactive Protein

Identifiers

PMID33361046
PMCPMC7759234
OpenAlexW3022088464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.