ArticleProgress in biophysics and molecular biology2021
Infrared neural stimulation at different wavelengths and pulse shapes.
Article in Progress in biophysics and molecular biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Electrophysiological Response of the Non-Anesthetized Primate Brain to Minimally Invasive Local Infrared Neural Stimulation in Chronic Experiments.Brain topography · 2025Article
- Beyond the Spectrum: Unleashing the Potential of Infrared Radiation in Poultry Industry Advancements.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Review
- Decreasing the physical gap in the neural-electrode interface and related concepts to improve cochlear implant performance.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Review
- Emerging trends in the development of flexible optrode arrays for electrophysiology.APL bioengineering · 2023Review
- A Micron-Sized Laser Photothermal Effect Evaluation System and Method.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Neural stimulation with infrared radiation has been explored for brain tissue, peripheral nerves, and cranial nerves including the auditory nerve. Initial experiments were conducted at wavelengths between λ = 1850 and λ = 2140 nm and the radiant energy was delivered with square pulses. Water absorption of the infrared radiation at λ = 1860 nm is similar to absorption at wavelengths between λ = 1310 and λ = 1600 nm, which are in the radiation wavelength range used for the communication industry. Technology for those wavelengths has already been developed and miniaturized and is readily available. The possibility of the infrared light to evoke compound action potentials (CAP) in the cochlea at λ = 1,375, λ = 1,460, and λ = 1550 nm was explored and compared to that of λ = 1860 nm in guinea pigs. Furthermore, rise and fall times of the 100 μs long pulses were changed and four basic pulse shapes (square, triangular, ramp-up, and ramp-down) were explored in their ability to evoke a CAP. In animals with pure tone threshold averages (PTAs) above 70 dB SPL, the results show that the favorable wavelength is λ = 1460 nm to reach threshold for stimulation and λ = 1375 nm or λ = 1460 nm for obtaining maximum amplitude. The most favorable pulse shape is either ramp-up or triangular.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.