Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33359843›Full record

ArticleBehavioural brain research2021

Preliminary effects of prefrontal tDCS on dopamine-mediated behavior and psychophysiology.

Michael J Imburgio, Hannah K Ballard, Astin C Cornwall, Darrell A Worthy, Jessica A Bernard, Joseph M Orr

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioural brain research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michael J ImburgioDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, United States. Electronic address: mimburgi@tamu.edu.
Hannah K BallardDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, United States; Texas A&M Institute for Neuroscience, United States.
Astin C CornwallDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, United States.
Darrell A WorthyDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, United States; Texas A&M Institute for Neuroscience, United States.
Jessica A BernardDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, United States; Texas A&M Institute for Neuroscience, United States.
Joseph M OrrDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, United States; Texas A&M Institute for Neuroscience, United States.

Funding

A computational neuroscience approach to frontal compensation in decision-makingR01AG043425 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI SCHNYER, DAVID M, WORTHY, DARRELL A. · 2014 to 2019
$1.7M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG043425
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to manipulate dopamine in vivo through non-invasive, reversible mechanisms has the potential to impact clinical, translational, and basic research. Recent PET studies have demonstrated increased dopamine release in the striatum after bifrontal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). We sought to extend this work by examining whether bifrontal tDCS could demonstrate an effect on behavioral and physiological correlates of subcortical dopamine activity. We conducted a preliminary between-subjects study (n = 30) with active and sham tDCS and used spontaneous eye blink rate (EBR), facial attractiveness ratings, and greyscales orienting bias as indirect proxies for dopamine functioning. The initial design and analyses were pre-registered (https://osf.io/gmnpc). Stimulation did not significantly affect any of the three measures, though effect sizes were often moderately large and were all in the predicted directions. Additional exploratory analyses suggested that stimulation's effect on EBR might depend on pre-stimulation dopamine levels. Our results suggest that larger samples than those that are standard in tDCS literature should be used to assess the effect of tDCS on dopamine using indirect measures. Further, exploratory results add to a growing body of work demonstrating the importance of accounting for individual differences in tDCS response.

Indexed as

IndividualityTranscranial Direct Current StimulationAdultBlinkingDopamineDorsolateral Prefrontal CortexFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultDopamineDLPFCDopamineIndividual differencesSpontaneous eyeblink ratetDCS

Identifiers

PMID33359843
PMCPMC7898411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.