Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33359778›Full record

ArticleAmerican heart journal2021

Patient-centered contrast thresholds to reduce acute kidney injury in high-risk patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Ali O Malik, Amit Amin, Kevin Kennedy, Mohammed Qintar, Ali Shafiq, Roxana Mehran, John A Spertus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American heart journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ali O MalikUniversity of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO; Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, MO. Electronic address: aomalik@saint-lukes.org.
Amit AminWashington University School of Medicine, Barnes Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO.
Kevin KennedySaint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, MO.
Mohammed QintarUniversity of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO; Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, MO.
Ali ShafiqAurora Health Care, Milwaukee, WI.
Roxana MehranMount Sinai Doctors Faculty Practice, New York, NY.
John A SpertusUniversity of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO; Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, MO.

Funding

CARDIOVASCULAR OUTCOMES RESEARCH TRAINING PROGRAMT32HL110837 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY · PI JOHN A SPERTUS · 2012 to 2026
$5.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL110837
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundContrast volume used during percutaneous coronary intervention has a direct relationship with contrast-associated acute kidney injury. While several models estimate the risk of contrast-associated acute kidney injury, only the strategy of limiting contrast volume to 3 × estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) gives actionable estimates of safe contrast volume doses. However, this method does not consider other patient characteristics associated with risk, such as age, diabetes or heart failure.

methodsUsing the National Cardiovascular Data Registry acute kidney injury risk model, we developed a novel strategy to define safe contrast limits by entering a contrast term into the model and using it to meet specific (eg, 10%) relative risk reductions. We then estimated acute kidney injury rates when our patient-centered model-derived thresholds were and were not exceeded using data from CathPCI version 5 between April 2018 and June 2019. We repeated the same analysis in a sub-set of patients who received ≤3 × eGFR contrast.

resultsAfter excluding patients on hemodialysis, below average risk (<7%), missing data and multiple percutaneous coronary interventions, our final analytical cohort included 141,133 patients at high risk for acute kidney injury. The rate of acute kidney injury was 10.0% when the contrast thresholds derived from our patient-centered model were met and 18.2% when they were exceeded (P < .001). In patients who received contrast ≤3 × eGFR (n = 82,318), contrast-associated acute kidney injury rate was 9.8% when the contrast thresholds derived from our patient centered model were met and 14.5% when they were exceeded (P < .001).

conclusionsA novel strategy for developing personalized contrast volume thresholds, provides actionable information for providers that could decrease rates of contrast-associated acute kidney injury. This strategy needs further prospective testing to assess efficacy in improving patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryAgedAge FactorsContrast MediaDiabetes ComplicationsFemaleGlomerular Filtration RateHeart FailureHumansMalePercutaneous Coronary InterventionRisk FactorsContrast Media

Identifiers

PMID33359778
PMCPMC7954906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.