Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33358911›Full record

ArticleJournal of virological methods2021

Preliminary optimisation of a simplified sample preparation method to permit direct detection of SARS-CoV-2 within saliva samples using reverse-transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP).

Emma L A Howson, Stephen P Kidd, Bryony Armson, Alice Goring, Jason Sawyer, Claire Cassar, David Cross, Tom Lewis, Jess Hockey, Samantha Rivers and 16 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virological methods, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Critical evaluation of strategies to achieve direct real-time PCR detection of swine pathogens in oral fluids.Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Emma L A HowsonGeneSys Biotech Limited, Camberley, Surrey, UK; The Pirbright Institute, Ash Road, Woking, Surrey, UK.
Stephen P KiddHampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Microbiology, Basingstoke and North Hants Hospital, Basingstoke, UK. Electronic address: Stephen.Kidd@hhft.nhs.uk.
Bryony ArmsonHampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Microbiology, Basingstoke and North Hants Hospital, Basingstoke, UK; vHive, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
Alice GoringHampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Microbiology, Basingstoke and North Hants Hospital, Basingstoke, UK.
Jason SawyerAnimal and Plant Health Agency, Addlestone, Surrey, UK.
Claire CassarAnimal and Plant Health Agency, Addlestone, Surrey, UK.
David CrossAnimal and Plant Health Agency, Addlestone, Surrey, UK.
Tom LewisAnimal and Plant Health Agency, Addlestone, Surrey, UK.
Jess HockeyAnimal and Plant Health Agency, Addlestone, Surrey, UK.
Samantha RiversAnimal and Plant Health Agency, Addlestone, Surrey, UK.
Saira CawthrawAnimal and Plant Health Agency, Addlestone, Surrey, UK.
Ashley BanyardAnimal and Plant Health Agency, Addlestone, Surrey, UK.
Paul AndersonAnimal and Plant Health Agency, Addlestone, Surrey, UK.
Sabah RahouAnimal and Plant Health Agency, Addlestone, Surrey, UK.
Michael AndreouOptiSense Limited, Horsham, West Sussex, UK.
Nick MorantGeneSys Biotech Limited, Camberley, Surrey, UK.
Duncan ClarkGeneSys Biotech Limited, Camberley, Surrey, UK.
Charlotte WalshGeneSys Biotech Limited, Camberley, Surrey, UK.
Shailen LaxmanOptiSense Limited, Horsham, West Sussex, UK.
Rebecca HoughtonHampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Microbiology, Basingstoke and North Hants Hospital, Basingstoke, UK.
Joanne Slater-JefferiesNational Biofilms Innovation Centre, University of Southampton, UK.
Paula CostelloMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, UK.
Ian BrownAnimal and Plant Health Agency, Addlestone, Surrey, UK.
Nicholas CortesHampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Microbiology, Basingstoke and North Hants Hospital, Basingstoke, UK; Gibraltar Health Authority, Gibraltar, UK.
Keith M GodfreyMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, UK; NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton, UK.
Veronica L FowlerHampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Microbiology, Basingstoke and North Hants Hospital, Basingstoke, UK.
Animal and Plant Health Agency · GBHampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBEast Sussex County Council · GBGibraltar Health Authority · GINIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre · GBThe Pirbright Institute · GBUniversity of Southampton · GBUniversity of Surrey · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_21001Medical Research Council MC_PC_21003Medical Research Council MC_UU_12011/4
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We describe the optimisation of a simplified sample preparation method which permits rapid and direct detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA within saliva, using reverse-transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP). Treatment of saliva samples prior to RT-LAMP by dilution 1:1 in Mucolyse™, followed by dilution in 10 % (w/v) Chelex© 100 Resin and a 98 °C heat step for 2 min enabled detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in positive saliva samples. Using RT-LAMP, SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected in as little as 05:43 min, with no amplification detected in 3097 real-time reverse transcription PCR (rRT-PCR) negative saliva samples from staff tested within a service evaluation study, or for other respiratory pathogens tested (n = 22). Saliva samples can be collected non-invasively, without the need for skilled staff and can be obtained from both healthcare and home settings. Critically, this approach overcomes the requirement for, and validation of, different swabs and the global bottleneck in obtaining access to extraction robots and reagents to enable molecular testing by rRT-PCR. Such testing opens the possibility of public health approaches for effective intervention during the COVID-19 pandemic through regular SARS-CoV-2 testing at a population scale, combined with isolation and contact tracing.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 TestingHumansMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesRNA, ViralSalivaSARS-CoV-2Specimen HandlingRNA, ViralCOVID-19Direct detectionNear patient testingRapid diagnosticsRT-LAMPSalivaSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID33358911
PMCPMC7750029
OpenAlexW3115361075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.