Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33358722›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American College of Radiology : JACR2021

Dense Breast Notification Laws' Association With Outcomes in the US Population: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Nancy R Kressin, Tracy A Battaglia, Jolie B Wormwood, Priscilla J Slanetz, Christine M Gunn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Women's Reactions to Breast Density Information Vary by Sociodemographic Characteristics.Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nancy R KressinSection of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address: nkressin@bu.ed.
Tracy A BattagliaSection of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts; Associate Director of the Belkin Breast Health Center, Boston Medical Center, and Director, Women's Health Group, Boston Medical Center.
Jolie B WormwoodDepartment of Psychology, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire.
Priscilla J SlanetzVice Chair of Academic Affairs and Associate Program Director of the Diagnostic Radiology Residency, Department of Radiology, Boston University Medical Center; President-Elect of the Massachusetts Radiological Society and Chair of the ACR Appropriateness Criteria Committee Breast Imaging Panel; Department of Radiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
Christine M GunnSection of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

Using Community-Engaged Methods to Design a Tool to Promote Informed Breast Cancer Screening Decisions for Low Literacy WomenK07CA221899 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI GUNN, CHRISTINE MARIE · 2018 to 2022
$642k
NCI NIH HHS K07 CA221899
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveUnderstanding whether states' breast density notifications are associated with desired effects, or disparities, can inform federal policy. We examined self-reported receipt of personal breast density information, breast density discussions with providers, knowledge about density's masking effect, and association with increased breast cancer risk by state legislation status and women's sociodemographic characteristics.

methodsCross-sectional observational population-based telephone survey of women aged >40 years who underwent mammography within prior 2 years, had no history of breast cancer, and had heard the term "breast density."

resultsAmong 2,306 women, 57% received personal breast density information. Multivariate regression models adjusted for covariates indicated that women in notification states were 1.5 times more likely to receive density information, and older Black and Asian women of lower income and lower health literacy were less likely. Overall, only 39% of women discussed density with providers; women in notification states were 1.75 times as likely. Older and Asian women were less likely to have spoken with providers; women with high literacy or prior biopsy were more likely. State legislation status was not associated with differences in density knowledge, but Hispanic women and women of lower income or low health literacy had less knowledge regarding density's masking effects; older women were more knowledgeable. Hispanic women and women of lower income or low health literacy were more likely, and middle-aged women less likely, to recognize increased breast cancer risk. DISCUSSION: Some positive effects were observed, but sociodemographic disparities suggest tailoring of future breast density communications for specific populations of women to ensure equitable understanding.

Indexed as

Breast DensityBreast NeoplasmsAgedCross-Sectional StudiesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMammographyMiddle AgedBreast cancer screeningdense breast notificationsdisparitiessurvey study

Identifiers

PMID33358722
PMCPMC8106616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.