Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33358057›Full record

ArticleBiosensors & bioelectronics2021

Paper-based electrochemical biosensor for diagnosing COVID-19: Detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and antigen.

Abdulhadee Yakoh, Umaporn Pimpitak, Sirirat Rengpipat, Nattiya Hirankarn, Orawon Chailapakul, Sudkate Chaiyo

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biosensors & bioelectronics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 206 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
206citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
31.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

206 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 488 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Paper-Based Sensors: Fantasy or Reality?Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

146 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Abdulhadee YakohInstitute of Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Umaporn PimpitakInstitute of Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Sirirat RengpipatDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand; Qualified Diagnostic Development Center, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Nattiya HirankarnDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand; Center of Excellence in Immunology and Immune-mediated Diseases, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Orawon ChailapakulElectrochemistry and Optical Spectroscopy Center of Excellence (EOSCE), Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Sudkate ChaiyoInstitute of Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand; Electrochemistry and Optical Spectroscopy Center of Excellence (EOSCE), Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand. Electronic address: sudkate.c@chula.ac.th.
Chulalongkorn University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is emerging as a global pandemic outbreak. To date, approximately one million deaths and over 32 million cases have been reported. This ongoing pandemic urgently requires an accurate testing device that can be used in the field in a fast manner. Serological assays to detect antibodies have been proven to be a great complement to the standard method of reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), particularly after the second week of infection. We have developed a specific and sensitive immunosensor for immunoglobulin detection produced against SARS-CoV-2. Unlike other lateral flow-based assays (LFAs) involving the utilization of multiple antibodies, we have reported a label-free paper-based electrochemical platform targeting SARS-CoV-2 antibodies without the specific requirement of an antibody. The presence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies will interrupt the redox conversion of the redox indicator, resulting in a decreased current response. This electrochemical sensor was proven effective in real clinical sera from patients with satisfactory results. In addition, the proposed format was also extended to antigen detection (the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2), which presents new possibilities for diagnosing COVID-19.

Indexed as

Antibodies, ViralAntigens, ViralBiosensing TechniquesCOVID-19COVID-19 Serological TestingCross ReactionsElectrochemical TechniquesEquipment DesignHumansPandemicsPaperSARS-CoV-2Spike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusAntibodies, ViralAntigens, ViralSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2COVID-19Electrochemical detectionPaper-based sensorsSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID33358057
PMCPMC7746088
OpenAlexW3111314177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.