Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33357710›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2021

Growth, carcass characteristics, meat quality, and microbial aspects of growing quail fed diets enriched with two different types of probiotics (Bacillus toyonensis and Bifidobacterium bifidum).

D E Abou-Kassem, M F Elsadek, A E Abdel-Moneim, S A Mahgoub, G M Elaraby, A E Taha, M M Elshafie, D M Alkhawtani, M E Abd El-Hack, E A Ashour

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Frontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Dietary probiotic supplementation withAnimal biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. DietaryVeterinary sciences · 2025
    Article
  11. Impact of dietary zinc nanoparticles and probiotics on broiler health and productivity.Journal of advanced veterinary and animal research · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Dietary ginger (Animal biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Comparable Evaluation of Nutritional Benefits ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. The Effects of DietaryAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  20. Hybridization altered the gut microbiota of pigs.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

D E Abou-KassemAnimal and Poultry Production Department, Faculty of Technology and Development, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
M F ElsadekDepartment of Community Health Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Saudi Arabia; Nutrition and Food Science Department, Helwan University, Helwan, Egypt. Electronic address: mfbadr@ksu.edu.sa.
A E Abdel-MoneimBiological Application Department, Nuclear Research Center, Atomic Energy Authority, Abu-Zaabal 13759, Egypt.
S A MahgoubDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Agriculture, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44111, Egypt.
G M ElarabyFood Science Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
A E TahaDepartment of Animal Husbandry and Animal Wealth Development, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Alexandria University, Rasheed, Edfina 22758, Egypt.
M M ElshafieDepartment of Community Health Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Saudi Arabia.
D M AlkhawtaniDepartment of Community Health Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Saudi Arabia.
M E Abd El-HackPoultry Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44511, Egypt. Electronic address: m.ezzat@zu.edu.eg.
E A AshourPoultry Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44511, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present investigation aimed to explore the impact of dietary graded levels of 2 types of probiotic bacteria (Bacillus toyonensis [BT] and Bifidobacterium bifidum [BB]) on growth, carcass traits, meat quality, and bacteriology of growing Japanese quail reared under the cage system. One thousand three hundred sixty Japanese quail day-old chicks were randomly divided into 10 groups (8 replicates each). Birds were fed a basal diet (control, T1) and the basal diet plus 0.05, 0.075, 0.10, and 0.125% BT (T2, T3, T4, and T5, respectively), 0.10% BB (T6), and the same previous doses of BT plus 0.05% BB (T7, T8, T9, and T10, respectively). Results showed a significant (P < 0.001) increase in final BW and weight gain because of probiotic supplementation (except T2 for weight gain). Both feed intake and feed conversion ratio did not differ during the overall experimental period (1-42 D of age) except feed intake that was reduced in T2 and increased in T5 and T9 groups. All carcass traits studied were significantly (P < 0.01) affected by probiotics, and the combination between BT and BB in group T8 increased all studied parameters as compared with the other treatment groups. The quail meat color of redness a∗ and L∗ values, thiobarbituric content, cooking loss, proteolysis, and total coliform were decreased (P < 0.001) by probiotic treatment. In general, supplementing BT, BB, or their combination to the basal diet delayed the proliferation of pathogenic bacteria in the diet and intestine. Using BT and BB as feed supplements enhanced growth performance and meat quality of quails as well as diminished pathogenic bacteria proliferation in their diet and intestine. As per our results, we can recommend the application of T5 and T8 to T10 levels for the best performance, carcass traits, and meat quality of growing quails.

Indexed as

BacillusBifidobacterium bifidumBody CompositionCoturnixDietMeatProbioticsAnimal FeedAnimalsBody Weightcarcassgrowthmeat qualityprobioticquail

Identifiers

PMID33357710
PMCPMC7772674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.