Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33357606›Full record

Trial reportJournal of substance abuse treatment2021

Technology-assisted methadone take-home dosing for dispensing methadone to persons with opioid use disorder during the Covid-19 pandemic.

Kelly E Dunn, Robert K Brooner, Kenneth B Stoller

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of substance abuse treatment, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03254043 (Evaluating a Novel Medication Device for Methadone Dosing), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03254043 nacompletednot on this map

Evaluating a Novel Medication Device for Methadone Dosing

TypeinterventionalSponsorJohns Hopkins UniversityRan2018 to 2020Enrolled26ConditionsOpioid-use DisorderArmsTake-home Dosing Procedures
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kelly E DunnJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 5510 Nathan Shock Drive, Baltimore, MD 21224, United States of America. Electronic address: kdunn9@jhmi.edu.
Robert K BroonerJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 5510 Nathan Shock Drive, Baltimore, MD 21224, United States of America. Electronic address: rkbrooner@jhmi.edu.
Kenneth B StollerJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 911 North Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States of America. Electronic address: kstolle@jhmi.edu.
Johns Hopkins Medicine · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Developing a Method to Empirically-evaluate Treatment for Pain within Opioid Maintenance PatientsR34DA042926 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI DUNN, KELLY E · 2017 to 2019
$694k
NIDA NIH HHS R34 DA042926
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCovid-19 confers substantial risk for the >400,000 patients who receive methadone for the treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD) and methods for safely dispensing large quantities of methadone to patients are lacking.

methodsThis study evaluated the MedMinder "Jon", an electronic and cellular-enabled pillbox that provides real-time monitoring to remotely manage take-home doses of methadone using a 12-week, within-subject, Phase II (NCT03254043) trial. We transitioned all participants from liquid to tablet methadone one week prior to randomization. Participants completed both treatment-as-usual and electronic pillbox conditions before choosing a condition in a final "choice phase". We assessed feasibility, satisfaction, and safety outcomes during the exit interview.

resultsOverall, we randomized 25 participants, 24 (96.0%) completed >1 study session, and 21 (84.0%) completed the exit interview. We dispensed 167.92 g (1,974 doses) of methadone. Participants would use the pillbox again (86.3%) and recommend it to others (95.4%). Overall, 52.4% selected the pillbox in the choice condition and those who did not cited issues related to study requirements. Less than 1% of pillbox alerts were for medication being consumed outside the dosing window and we observed no evidence of actual or attempted methadone diversion. DISCUSSION: We were able to adequately manage patients who would not otherwise qualify for large quantities of take-home methadone when we dispensed methadone tablets via a secure pillbox. The integration of a commercially available pillbox into routine clinic operations increases opportunity for dispensing medication. Our data support remote monitoring of methadone take-home doses and may inform clinic practices related to Covid-19.

Indexed as

COVID-19Self-Help DevicesAdultAnalgesics, OpioidFemaleHumansMaleMedication AdherenceMethadoneOpiate Substitution TreatmentOpioid-Related DisordersSurveys and QuestionnairesAnalgesics, OpioidMethadoneCOVID-19MethadoneOpioid use disorderPainTake-homeTechnology-assisted

Identifiers

PMID33357606
PMCPMC7834258
OpenAlexW3110434642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.