Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33357237›Full record

ArticlePneumonia (Nathan Qld.)2020

Cost effectiveness analysis of implementing tuberculosis screening among applicants for non-immigrant U.S. work visas.

Bisma Ali Sayed, Drew L Posey, Brian Maskery, La'Marcus T Wingate, Martin S Cetron

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pneumonia (Nathan Qld.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 86% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Bisma Ali SayedDivision of Global Migration and Quarantine, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, Building 16, MS 16-4, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA.
Drew L PoseyDivision of Global Migration and Quarantine, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, Building 16, MS 16-4, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA.
Brian MaskeryDivision of Global Migration and Quarantine, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, Building 16, MS 16-4, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA. wqm7@cdc.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1601-969X
La'Marcus T WingateCollege of Pharmacy, Howard University, Washington, DC, USA.
Martin S CetronDivision of Global Migration and Quarantine, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, Building 16, MS 16-4, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USHoward University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile persons who receive immigrant and refugee visas are screened for active tuberculosis before admission into the United States, nonimmigrant visa applicants (NIVs) are not routinely screened and may enter the United States with infectious tuberculosis.

objectivesWe evaluated the costs and benefits of expanding pre-departure tuberculosis screening requirements to a subset of NIVs who arrive from a moderate (Mexico) or high (India) incidence tuberculosis country with temporary work visas.

methodsWe developed a decision tree model to evaluate the program costs and estimate the numbers of active tuberculosis cases that may be diagnosed in the United States in two scenarios: 1) "Screening": screening and treatment for tuberculosis among NIVs in their home country with recommended U.S. follow-up for NIVs at elevated risk of active tuberculosis; and, 2) "No Screening" in their home country so that cases would be diagnosed passively and treatment occurs after entry into the United States. Costs were assessed from multiple perspectives, including multinational and U.S.-only perspectives.

resultsUnder "Screening" versus "No Screening", an estimated 179 active tuberculosis cases and 119 hospitalizations would be averted in the United States annually via predeparture treatment. From the U.S.-only perspective, this program would result in annual net cost savings of about $3.75 million. However, rom the multinational perspective, the screening program would cost $151,388 per U.S. case averted for Indian NIVs and $221,088 per U.S. case averted for Mexican NIVs.

conclusionFrom the U.S.-only perspective, the screening program would result in substantial cost savings in the form of reduced treatment and hospitalization costs. NIVs would incur increased pre-departure screening and treatment costs.

Indexed as

Cost effectivenessMigrationScreeningTuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID33357237
PMCPMC7761151
OpenAlexW3114220162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.