Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33357231›Full record

Trial reportBreast cancer research : BCR2020

Tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes as a prognostic and tamoxifen predictive marker in premenopausal breast cancer: data from a randomised trial with long-term follow-up.

Christine Lundgren, Pär-Ola Bendahl, Maria Ekholm, Mårten Fernö, Carina Forsare, Ute Krüger, Bo Nordenskjöld, Olle Stål, Lisa Rydén

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christine LundgrenDepartment of Oncology, Region Jönköping County, Jönköping, Sweden. christine.lundgren@med.lu.se.ORCID 0000-0002-7880-2981
Pär-Ola BendahlDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Division of Oncology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-8862-1845
Maria EkholmDepartment of Oncology, Region Jönköping County, Jönköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-5553-5323
Mårten FernöDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Division of Oncology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-2220-1236
Carina ForsareDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Division of Oncology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-2987-2940
Ute KrügerDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Division of Oncology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-6140-2001
Bo NordenskjöldDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-2134-7586
Olle StålDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-8290-0592
Lisa RydénDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Division of Surgery, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-7515-3130
Lund University · SELinköping University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are of important prognostic and predictive value in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer (BC) and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), but their clinical relevance in oestrogen receptor-positive/HER2-negative (ER+/HER2-) remains unknown. The primary study aim was to analyse the prognostic effect of TILs on the BC-free interval (BCFi) in premenopausal patients stratified by BC subtypes. The secondary aim was to investigate if TILs are predictive of tamoxifen (TAM) benefit.

methodsArchival tissues from primary breast tumours were collected from patients from the SBII:2pre trial, in which 564 premenopausal women were randomised to 2 years of adjuvant TAM or no systemic treatment, regardless of hormone receptor status. TILs were scored on whole tissue sections from 447 patients with available ER status. Tumours were divided into ER+/HER2-, HER2+ and TNBC subtypes by immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridisation. The prognostic value of TILs was analysed in systemically untreated patients (n = 221); the predictive information was investigated in the ER+ subgroup (n = 321) by cumulative incidence curves and Cox regression analyses. The median follow-up was 28 years.

resultsHigh (≥ 50%) infiltration of TILs was a favourable prognostic factor in terms of BCFi (univariable analysis: hazard ratio

conclusionsWe demonstrate a long-term favourable prognostic value of high infiltration of TILs in a cohort of premenopausal BC patients and the positive prognostic effect was extended to the ER+/HER2- subgroup. A beneficial effect of TAM in ER+ patients was observed in patients with tumours of low TIL infiltration, but evidence for a treatment predictive effect was weak.

trial registrationThis trial is registered in the ISRCTN database, trial ID: ISRCTN12474687 .

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorBreastBreast NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantDisease-Free SurvivalDrug Resistance, NeoplasmErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansImmunohistochemistryLymphocytes, Tumor-InfiltratingMastectomyMiddle AgedBiomarkers, TumorERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesReceptors, EstrogenTamoxifenBiomarkerBreast cancerPredictivePremenopausalPrognosisTamoxifenTILs

Identifiers

PMID33357231
PMCPMC7758933
OpenAlexW3114085356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.