Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33357222›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2020

Automated detection of activity onset after postictal generalized EEG suppression.

Bishal Lamichhane, Yejin Kim, Santiago Segarra, Guoqiang Zhang, Samden Lhatoo, Jaison Hampson, Xiaoqian Jiang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bishal LamichhaneElectrical and Computer Engineering Department, Rice University, 6100 Main St, Houston, TX, USA. bishal.lamichhane@rice.edu.
Yejin KimSchool of Biomedical Informatics, UT Health, 7000 Fannin St Suite 600, Houston, TX, USA.
Santiago SegarraElectrical and Computer Engineering Department, Rice University, 6100 Main St, Houston, TX, USA.
Guoqiang ZhangDepartment of Neurology, McGovern Medical School, UT Health, 6430 Fannin St, Houston, TX, USA.
Samden LhatooDepartment of Neurology, McGovern Medical School, UT Health, 6430 Fannin St, Houston, TX, USA.
Jaison HampsonDepartment of Neurology, McGovern Medical School, UT Health, 6430 Fannin St, Houston, TX, USA.
Xiaoqian JiangSchool of Biomedical Informatics, UT Health, 7000 Fannin St Suite 600, Houston, TX, USA.
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USRice University · US

Funding

The Center for SUDEP Research (CSR), Informatics and Data Analytics Core (IDAC)U01NS090408 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI ZHANG, GUO-QIANG · 2014 to 2018
$3.8M
The Administrative Core of the Center of SUDEP ResearchU01NS090405 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI LHATOO, SAMDEN, NOEBELS, JEFFREY · 2014 to 2018
$3.2M
NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS090405NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS090408
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) is a leading cause of premature death in patients with epilepsy. If timely assessment of SUDEP risk can be made, early interventions for optimized treatments might be provided. One of the biomarkers being investigated for SUDEP risk assessment is postictal generalized EEG suppression [postictal generalized EEG suppression (PGES)]. For example, prolonged PGES has been found to be associated with a higher risk for SUDEP. Accurate characterization of PGES requires correct identification of the end of PGES, which is often complicated due to signal noise and artifacts, and has been reported to be a difficult task even for trained clinical professionals. In this work we present a method for automatic detection of the end of PGES using multi-channel EEG recordings, thus enabling the downstream task of SUDEP risk assessment by PGES characterization.

methodsWe address the detection of the end of PGES as a classification problem. Given a short EEG snippet, a trained model classifies whether it consists of the end of PGES or not. Scalp EEG recordings from a total of 134 patients with epilepsy are used for training a random forest based classification model. Various time-series based features are used to characterize the EEG signal for the classification task. The features that we have used are computationally inexpensive, making it suitable for real-time implementations and low-power solutions. The reference labels for classification are based on annotations by trained clinicians identifying the end of PGES in an EEG recording.

resultsWe evaluated our classification model on an independent test dataset from 34 epileptic patients and obtained an AUreceiver operating characteristic (ROC) (area under the curve) of 0.84. We found that inclusion of multiple EEG channels is important for better classification results, possibly owing to the generalized nature of PGES. Of among the channels included in our analysis, the central EEG channels were found to provide the best discriminative representation for the detection of the end of PGES.

conclusionAccurate detection of the end of PGES is important for PGES characterization and SUDEP risk assessment. In this work, we showed that it is feasible to automatically detect the end of PGES-otherwise difficult to detect due to EEG noise and artifacts-using time-series features derived from multi-channel EEG recordings. In future work, we will explore deep learning based models for improved detection and investigate the downstream task of PGES characterization for SUDEP risk assessment.

Indexed as

EpilepsySeizuresElectroencephalographyHumansEEG suppressionEpilepsyPGESSUDEP

Identifiers

PMID33357222
PMCPMC7758926
OpenAlexW3113903945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.