Trial reportBMC medicine2020
Clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation and frailty: insights from the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial.
Trial report in BMC medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00781391 (A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Parallel Group, Multi-Center, Multi-National Study for Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Edoxaban), which is not on this map. Cited by 62 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Parallel Group, Multi-Center, Multi-National Study for Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Edoxaban (DU-176b) Versus Warfarin In Subjects With Atrial Fibrillation - Effective Anticoagulation With Factor Xa Next Generation in Atrial Fibrillation (ENGAGE - AF TIMI - 48)
Who cites it
62 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 109 citations in OpenAlex.
- Switching from Vitamin K Antagonists to Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Frail Elderly Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Pooled it
- Clinical outcomes of off-label DOAC underdosing in Japanese patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2025Pooled it
- Assessing Frailty-Specific Treatment Effect in Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review.Drugs & aging · 2024Pooled it
- Frailty as an Effect Modifier in Randomized Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review.Journal of general internal medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Effectiveness and Safety of DOACs vs. Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Frailty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Impact of frailty on outcomes in atrial fibrillation and HFpEF: data from the TOPCAT trial.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Trial
- Effects of ablation versus drug therapy on clinical outcomes and quality of life by frailty status in atrial fibrillation: a post hoc analysis of the CABANA trial.BMC medicine · 2026Trial
- Efficacy of the ABC Pathway for Integrated Care Across Phenotypes of Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Latent-Class Analysis Report from the mAFA-II Clinical Trial.Journal of general internal medicine · 2025Trial
- Outcomes and Safety of Very-Low-Dose Edoxaban in Frail Patients With Atrial Fibrillation in the ELDERCARE-AF Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2022Trial
- An Easy-to-Implement Clinical-Trial Frailty Index Based on Accumulation of Deficits: Validation in Zoster Vaccine Clinical Trials.Clinical interventions in aging · 2022Trial
- Article
- Clinical outcomes after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in elderly patients: a meta-analysis with time-to-event data reconstruction.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2026Review
- History of falls in patients with atrial fibrillation and risk of major outcomes: analysis from the Prospective GLORIA-AF Registry.GeroScience · 2026Article
- Polypharmacy and cardiovascular co-morbidity as key contributors to frailty in geriatric patients with AF - insights of the Dutch-GERAF cohort study.BMC geriatrics · 2026Observational
- Impact of a history of falls on clinical outcomes in older adult non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients: an ANAFIE registry study.BMC geriatrics · 2026Observational
- Are the Direct Oral Anticoagulants Better Than Warfarin for the Prevention and Treatment of Stroke and Atrial Fibrillation?Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2026Review
- Sarcopenia in atrial fibrillation: a risk factor for adverse outcomes in a UK Biobank study.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025Article
- Anticoagulation in Frail Older Adults with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation: Clinical Challenges and Personalized Approach.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Call to collaborate on data science for older people across Europe: an EuGMS Big Data Special Interest Group position paper.European geriatric medicine · 2025Article
- Multivariable Mendelian randomization study supports the causal effects of circulating metabolites on frailty.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2025Article
2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAtrial fibrillation (AF) is common in older people with frailty and is associated with an increased risk of stroke and systemic embolism. Whilst oral anticoagulation is associated with a reduction in this risk, there is a lack of data on the safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in people with frailty. This study aims to report clinical outcomes of patients with AF in the Effective Anticoagulation with Factor Xa Next Generation in Atrial Fibrillation-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 48 (ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48) trial by frailty status.
methodsPost hoc analysis of 20,867 participants in the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial, representing 98.8% of those randomised. This double-blinded double-dummy trial compared two once-daily regimens of edoxaban (a DOAC) with warfarin. Participants were categorised as fit, living with pre-frailty, mild-moderate, or severe frailty according to a standardised index, based upon the cumulative deficit model. The primary efficacy endpoint was stroke or systemic embolism and the safety endpoint was major bleeding.
resultsA fifth (19.6%) of the study population had frailty (fit: n = 4459, pre-frailty: n = 12,326, mild-moderate frailty: n = 3722, severe frailty: n = 360). On average over the follow-up period, the risk of stroke or systemic embolism increased by 37% (adjusted HR 1.37, 95% CI 1.19-1.58) and major bleeding by 42% (adjusted HR 1.42, 1.27-1.59) for each 0.1 increase in the frailty index (four additional health deficits). Edoxaban was associated with similar efficacy to warfarin in every frailty category, and a lower risk of bleeding than warfarin in all but those living with severe frailty.
conclusionsEdoxaban was similarly efficacious to warfarin across the frailty spectrum and was associated with lower rates of bleeding except in those with severe frailty. Overall, with increasing frailty, there was an increase in stroke and bleeding risk. There is a need for high-quality, frailty-specific population randomised control trials to guide therapy in this vulnerable population.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT00781391 . First registered on 28 October 2008.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.