Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33357058›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2021

Making gene drive biodegradable.

Josef Zapletal, Neda Najmitabrizi, Madhav Erraguntla, Mark A Lawley, Kevin M Myles, Zach N Adelman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Genetic Approaches for Controlling CRISPR-based Autonomous Homing Gene Drives.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Novel control strategies for mosquito-borne diseases.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Josef ZapletalDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Neda NajmitabriziDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Madhav ErraguntlaDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Mark A LawleyDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Kevin M MylesDepartment of Entomology and Agrilife Research, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Zach N AdelmanDepartment of Entomology and Agrilife Research, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.

Funding

Self-Eliminating Strategy To Control Gene DriveR01AI148787 · NIAID · TEXAS A&M AGRILIFE RESEARCH · PI Zach N. Adelman, KEVIN M MYLES · 2020 to 2026
$4.4M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI148787
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene drive systems have long been sought to modify mosquito populations and thus combat malaria and dengue. Powerful gene drive systems have been developed in laboratory experiments, but may never be used in practice unless they can be shown to be acceptable through rigorous field-based testing. Such testing is complicated by the anticipated difficulty in removing gene drive transgenes from nature. Here, we consider the inclusion of self-elimination mechanisms into the design of homing-based gene drive transgenes. This approach not only caused the excision of the gene drive transgene, but also generates a transgene-free allele resistant to further action by the gene drive. Strikingly, our models suggest that this mechanism, acting at a modest rate (10%) as part of a single-component system, would be sufficient to cause the rapid reversion of even the most robust homing-based gene drive transgenes, without the need for further remediation. Modelling also suggests that unlike gene drive transgenes themselves, self-eliminating transgene approaches are expected to tolerate substantial rates of failure. Thus, self-elimination technology may permit rigorous field-based testing of gene drives by establishing strict time limits on the existence of gene drive transgenes in nature, rendering them essentially biodegradable. This article is part of the theme issue 'Novel control strategies for mosquito-borne diseases'.

Indexed as

TransgenesAnimalsCulicidaeDengueGene Drive TechnologyMalariaMosquito Vectorsclustered regulatory interspaced palindromic repeatgene drivemitigation strategymosquitorisk assessmentself-elimination mechanism

Identifiers

PMID33357058
PMCPMC7776940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.