ArticleGM crops & food2021
GM trust shaped by trust determinants with the impact of risk/benefit framework: the contingent role of food technology neophobia.
Article in GM crops & food, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- scientific, social, ecological rationality and public attitudes toward genetically modified food in China: based on the survey of urban residents in three cities of China.GM crops & food · 2026Article
- Genetically modified rice in Iran: scientific progress, policy constraints, and prospects for sustainable food security.GM crops & food · 2026Review
- Understanding Consumer Acceptance of Genetically Modified Foods: A Theory of Planned Behavior-Brand Equity-Sociodemographic Interactions.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Seafood not from the sea: examining consumer behavioral intentions toward plant-based seafood.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- When parasocial relationships meet food technology neophobia: understanding consumer responses to virtual influencer marketing of upcycled foods.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Utilizing Dimensions of Trust to Communicate with Consumers About the Science Behind Food.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Genetically modified crops and sustainable development: navigating challenges and opportunities.Food science and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Growing knowledge impact of gene-editing technology on public acceptance: a longitudinal analysis in Japan.GM crops & food · 2024Article
- Impacts of knowledge and trust on consumer perceptions and purchase intentions towards genetically modified foods.PloS one · 2024Article
- Article
- Effect of Consumption Value on Consumer Willingness to Consume GM Food: A Post-COVID-19 Analysis.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Chinese Consumers' Trust in Food Safety Surveillance Sampling of Commonly Consumed Foods.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Effect of Institutional Trust on Consumers' Health and Safety Perceptions and Repurchase Intention for Traceable Fresh Food.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- An Experimental Evidence on Public Acceptance of Genetically Modified Food through Advertisement Framing on Health and Environmental Benefits, Objective Knowledge, and Risk Reduction.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study is comparative in natures that focus on understanding the factors that influence the GM food trust level in the BRA framework and food technology neophobia in China and the USA. For this purpose, we collected 300 and 350 valid responses, respectively, through a structured questionnaire. By carefully evaluating the above relationships, we found that trust determinants such as institutional trust, technology trust, information revealed with GM food vary across both datasets. However, GM knowledge has a better association with GM food trust in both cases. Apart from this, the food technology neophobia slightly moderates the benefits-risk perception of consumers and GM trust. This study guides the policymakers to enhance GM knowledge, as GM food is scientifically proven safe for health and environment and can be a financial incentive for the farmers. Further, the study also provides direction for corporate managers to design effective marketing and communication strategies in two different countries by investigating GM food trust's primary motivators in both nations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.