ArticleBioengineered2021
Clinical importance of serum secreted clusterin in predicting invasive breast cancer and treatment responses.
Article in Bioengineered, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Circulating Clusterin Levels and Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterPooled it
- Article
- Clinical significance of androgen receptor in unilateral invasive breast cancer in women.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Identifying therapeutic targets for breast cancer: insights from systematic Mendelian randomization analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Breast cancer risk coordinators: Artificial intelligence-based density measurement and Mullerian-inhibiting substance.Irish journal of medical science · 2023Article
- Quantifiable peptide library bridges the gap for proteomics based biomarker discovery and validation on breast cancer.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Clusterin and Its Isoforms in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Their Potential as Biomarkers: A Comprehensive Review.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- Construction of 2DE Patterns of Plasma Proteins: Aspect of Potential Tumor Markers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Quantitative Plasma Proteomics to Identify Candidate Biomarkers of Relapse in Pediatric/Adolescent Hodgkin Lymphoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Cytoplasmic Clusterin Suppresses Lung Cancer Metastasis by Inhibiting the ROCK1-ERK Axis.Cancers · 2022Article
- A pan-cancer analysis reveals role of clusterin (Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- The Influence of Clusterin Glycosylation Variability on Selected Pathophysiological Processes in the Human Body.Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2022Review
- Long Noncoding RNA 00472: A Novel Biomarker in Human Diseases.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Review
- Construction and validation of predictive model based on endoplasmic reticulum stress-related genes for triple-negative breast cancer.Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Enhanced serum secreted clusterin (sCLU) protein was associated with progression, poor prognosis and chemotherapy sensitivity evaluation in malignant patients. However, the clinical significance of serum sCLU protein levels in patients with invasive breast cancer (IBC) is unknown. In this study, the serum sCLU protein in 2648 patients with IBC was detected. The diagnostic value and treatment responses of serum sCLU protein in patients with IBC were also performed. The results showed that the serum sCLU protein level was significantly higher in IBC patients compared to the healthy controls (P < 0.0001), and strongly correlated with higher clinical tumor stage (P < 0.001), lymph node metastasis (P < 0.001), shorter overall survival (OS) (P = 0.032) and disease-free survival (DFS) (P = 0.029), respectively. Using the cutoff value of 18.46 μg/mL, the sensitivity and specificity were 86.26% and 73.46% to separate IBC patients from noncancerous and healthy controls. The postoperative patients showed lower serum sCLU levels compared to the preoperative patients (P = 0.003). The chemoresistant patients showed higher serum sCLU levels compared to the chemosensitive patients (P < 0.001). These data indicated that serum sCLU levels are effective indicators for diagnosis and chemotherapy sensitivity evaluation in patients with IBC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.