Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33356665›Full record

Observational studyThe European journal of general practice2020

Availability of point-of-care culture and microscopy in general practice - does it lead to more appropriate use of antibiotics in patients with suspected urinary tract infection?

Anne Holm, Volkert Siersma, Lars Bjerrum, Gloria Cordoba

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The European journal of general practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02698332 (Effect of a Diagnostic Algorithm for Urinary Tract Infection on Appropriate Use of Antibiotics and Diagnostics in General Practice - a Cluster Randomized Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02698332 nacompletednot on this map

Effect of a Diagnostic Algorithm for Urinary Tract Infection on Appropriate Use of Antibiotics and Diagnostics in General Practice - a Cluster Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of CopenhagenRan2016 to 2016Enrolled1,550ConditionsUrinary Tract InfectionArmsAlgorithm for UTI
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anne HolmResearch Unit for General Practice and Department of General Practice, University of Copenhagen Copenhagen, Denmark.
Volkert SiersmaResearch Unit for General Practice and Department of General Practice, University of Copenhagen Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lars BjerrumResearch Unit for General Practice and Department of General Practice, University of Copenhagen Copenhagen, Denmark.
Gloria CordobaResearch Unit for General Practice and Department of General Practice, University of Copenhagen Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUrinary tract infection (UTI) is a common condition in general practice, and urine culture can help reduce inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions. In case of delay of the result, antibiotic treatment can be guided by one or more point-of-care (POC) tests. In Denmark, POC microscopy and POC urine culture are widely used for this purpose.

objectivesTo investigate if availability of POC microscopy or POC culture in general practice was associated with a more appropriate treatment decision in patients with suspected UTI while waiting for the result from the microbiological laboratory.

methodsThis prospective observational study was conducted in 2016 in general practice in the Copenhagen area, Denmark. Data on all patients presenting in general practice with symptoms of UTI were registered anonymously and a urine sample was sent for culture at the microbiological laboratory. The association between the availability of POC tests and the appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing was assessed with multivariable logistic regression.

resultsSeventy-six general practices included 1545 patients (83% female); 71% received appropriate treatment in practices with POC culture available and 65% in practices without POC culture available (

conclusionAvailability of POC culture marginally increased appropriate treatment while waiting for the result from the microbiological laboratory. Practices should adopt a strategy where they either perform culture within the practice or send urine for culture at the microbiological laboratory. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02698332.

Indexed as

General PracticePoint-of-Care SystemsAdolescentAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsChildChild, PreschoolCulture MediaDenmarkFemaleHumansInfantMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesUrinary Tract InfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCulture Mediaculture mediageneral practicemicroscopypoint-of-care testingUrinary tract infections

Identifiers

PMID33356665
PMCPMC7781897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.