Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33356577›Full record

ArticleHand (New York, N.Y.)2022

Influences of Repair Site Tension and Conduit Splinting on Peripheral Nerve Reconstruction.

David M Brogan, Christopher J Dy, Dana Rioux-Forker, Jason Wever, Fraser J Leversedge

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hand (New York, N.Y.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 57% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Role of Nerve Tension on Nerve Repair Success.Journal of hand surgery global online · 2024
    Review
  5. Ten Myths in Nerve Surgery.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Tissue engineering. Part A · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

David M BroganWashington University in St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6259-4885
Christopher J DyWashington University in St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1422-2483
Dana Rioux-ForkerUniversity of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Jason WeverWashington University in St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5702-3583
Fraser J LeversedgeUniversity of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3810-3713
Washington University in St. Louis · USUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · USUniversity of Missouri · US

Funding

Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational Sciences (KL2) KL2TR002346 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Dominic N Reeds · 2017 to 2026
$14.0M
Resource Based Center for Musculoskeletal Biology and Medicine (Overall Application)P30AR074992 · NIAMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Yousef Abu-Amer · 2019 to 2026
$6.8M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002346NIAMS NIH HHS P30 AR074992
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe investigated the use of a conduit splinting technique to mitigate tension at the coaptation site of a rodent nerve defect model to determine the optimal reconstruction method for segmental nerve defects.

methodsA rat sciatic nerve segmental defect model was created by excising 5mm of the sciatic nerve unilaterally. Four groups of 10 rats were each reconstructed using 1 of 4 techniques: primary repair, repair with conduit splinting, reverse isograft with conduit splinting, and reverse isograft without splinting. Functional outcomes were assessed at 6 weeks by measurement of Sciatic Functional Index (SFI), and sciatic nerves were harvested at the nonsurvival surgery. Histomorphologic measurements were reported as a value normalized to the average measurements of the control side. The primary outcomes were assessment of nerve continuity and the proportion of nerve fibers in the regenerating nerve compared with the uninjured side.

resultsThe number of repair site rupture rates was lower when a conduit splint was used-less than half of the primary repairs under tension remained intact at 6 weeks. No difference was seen in axon number, size, and density between primary repairs and those augmented by conduit splints, but worse functional outcomes and more debris were present compared with the intact primary repairs.

conclusionsNerve conduit splinting reduced rupture rates, particularly for nerve repairs associated with a segmental defect. No significant difference was seen in the number of axons among techniques. Primary nerve repair under tension that did not rupture demonstrated superior SFI.

Indexed as

Nerve RegenerationSciatic NerveAnimalsAxonsNeurosurgical ProceduresRatsRats, Sprague-Dawleygapperipheral nervesegmental defecttension

Identifiers

PMID33356577
PMCPMC9608270
OpenAlexW3117111842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.