Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33356534›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of ophthalmology2021

Evidence-based of conjunctival COVID-19 positivity: An Italian experience: Gemelli Against COVID Group.

Maria Cristina Savastano, Gloria Gambini, Alfonso Savastano, Benedetto Falsini, Umberto De Vico, Maurizio Sanguinetti, Paola Cattani, Simona Marchetti, Anna Rita Larici, Francesco Franceschi and 7 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Corneal Donation: Current Guidelines and Future Direction.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2021
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maria Cristina SavastanoOphthalmology Unit, "Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS", Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1397-4333
Gloria GambiniOphthalmology Unit, "Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS", Rome, Italy.
Alfonso SavastanoOphthalmology Unit, "Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS", Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1575-6567
Benedetto FalsiniOphthalmology Unit, "Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS", Rome, Italy.
Umberto De VicoOphthalmology Unit, "Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS", Rome, Italy.
Maurizio SanguinettiInstitute of Microbiology, Catholic University of "Sacro Cuore", Rome, Italy.
Paola CattaniCatholic University "Sacro Cuore", Rome, Italy.
Simona MarchettiCatholic University "Sacro Cuore", Rome, Italy.
Anna Rita LariciCatholic University "Sacro Cuore", Rome, Italy.
Francesco FranceschiCatholic University "Sacro Cuore", Rome, Italy.
Angelo SantoliquidoCatholic University "Sacro Cuore", Rome, Italy.
Rossana MoroniScientific Direction, "Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS", Rome, Lazio, Italy.
Andrea CambieriHospital Health Management, "Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS", Rome, Italy.
Rocco BellantoneCatholic University "Sacro Cuore", Rome, Italy.
Francesco LandiCatholic University "Sacro Cuore", Rome, Italy.
Giovanni ScambiaCatholic University "Sacro Cuore", Rome, Italy.
Stanislao RizzoOphthalmology Unit, "Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS", Rome, Italy.
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITAgostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe possible transmission of severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) by tears and conjunctiva is still debated.

methodsMain outcome was to investigate the agreement between nasopharyngeal swab (NPs) and conjunctival swabs (Cs) in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. We divided patients into four groups: (1) NPs and Cs both negative (C-NF-), (2) NPs positive and Cs negative (NFs+Cs-), (3) NPs negative and Cs positive (NFs-Cs+), and (4) NPs and Cs both positive (NFs-Cs+). The secondary outcomes were to correlate Cs results with systemic clinical parameters such as: oxygen saturation (SpO

resultsA total of 100 conjunctival swabs in 50 patients with SARS-CoV-2 have been enrolled in this interventional clinical trials. Ocular signs (conjunctivitis) were present in five patients (10%). NPs and Cs highlighted a poor level of agreement (0.025;

conclusionsIn patients hospitalized for SARS-CoV-2 the virus can be detected in conjunctival swab. Intensive care unit patients may reveal a higher COVID-19 presence in the conjunctiva. The most severe pulmonary impairment can be observed in NFs and Cs positivity.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov registration. ETHICAL COMMITTEE AUTHORIZATION: ID number: 0013008/20.

Indexed as

COVID-19ConjunctivaHumansItalySARS-CoV-2Conjunctival swabCOVID-19eye infectionophthalmologistspersonalized medicineprecautionary measuresSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID33356534
PMCPMC7768604
OpenAlexW3117732023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.