Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33356213›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2021

Generalization of Block-Localized Wave Function for Constrained Optimization of Excited Determinants.

Adam Grofe, Ruoqi Zhao, Andrew Wildman, Torin F Stetina, Xiaosong Li, Peng Bao, Jiali Gao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Excimer Energies.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Multistate Density Functional Theory of Excited States.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Multistate Density Functional Theory: Theory, Methods, and Applications.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Computational molecular science
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Adam GrofeLaboratory of Theoretical and Computational Chemistry, Institute of Theoretical Chemistry, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin 130023, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8531-4396
Ruoqi ZhaoLaboratory of Theoretical and Computational Chemistry, Institute of Theoretical Chemistry, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin 130023, China.
Andrew WildmanDepartment of Chemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7013-6550
Torin F StetinaDepartment of Chemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, United States.
Xiaosong LiDepartment of Chemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7341-6240
Peng BaoBeijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences, State Key Laboratory for Structural Chemistry of Unstable and Stable Species, Institute of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
Jiali GaoInstitute of Systems and Physical Biology, Shenzhen Bay Laboratory, Shenzhen 518055, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0106-7154

Funding

BIOMOLECULAR INTERACTIONS AND ENZYMATIC PROCESSESR01GM046736 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI JIALI GAO · 1993 to 2026
$6.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM046736
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The block-localized wave function method is useful to provide insights on chemical bonding and intermolecular interactions through energy decomposition analysis. The method relies on block localization of molecular orbitals (MOs) by constraining the orbitals to basis functions within given blocks. Here, a generalized block-localized orbital (GBLO) method is described to allow both physically localized and delocalized MOs to be constrained in orbital-block definitions. Consequently, GBLO optimization can be conveniently tailored by imposing specific constraints. The GBLO method is illustrated by three examples: (1) constrained polarization response orbitals through dipole and quadrupole perturbation in a water dimer complex, (2) the ground and first excited-state potential energy curves of ethene about its C-C bond rotation, and (3) excitation energies of double electron excited states. Multistate density functional theory is used to determine the energies of the adiabatic ground and excited states using a minimal active space (MAS) comprising specifically charge-constrained and excited determinant configurations that are variationally optimized by the GBLO method. We find that the GBLO expansion that includes delocalized MOs in configurational blocks significantly reduces computational errors in comparison with physical block localization, and the computed ground- and excited-state energies are in good accordance with experiments and results obtained from multireference configuration interaction calculations.

Identifiers

PMID33356213
PMCPMC12747308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.