Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33355923›Full record

ArticleThe New phytologist2021

Comparative genomics reveals dynamic genome evolution in host specialist ectomycorrhizal fungi.

Lotus A Lofgren, Nhu H Nguyen, Rytas Vilgalys, Joske Ruytinx, Hui-Ling Liao, Sara Branco, Alan Kuo, Kurt LaButti, Anna Lipzen, William Andreopoulos and 8 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The New phytologist, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Identification and Classification of Fungal GPCR Gene Families.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Elevated COThe New phytologist · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Differential Strategies of Ectomycorrhizal Development betweenJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Lotus A LofgrenDepartment of Microbiology and Plant Pathology, University of California Riverside, Riverside, CA, 92507, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0632-102X
Nhu H NguyenDepartment of Tropical Plant and Soil Science, University of Hawaii, Manoa, HI, 96822, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8276-7042
Rytas VilgalysDepartment of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8299-3605
Joske RuytinxResearch group Microbiology, Department of Bio-engineering Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, BE1500, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-5835-3704
Hui-Ling LiaoDepartment of Soil Microbial Ecology, University of Florida, Quincy, FL, 32351, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1648-3444
Sara BrancoDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO, 80204, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9890-933X
Alan KuoUS Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3514-3530
Kurt LaButtiUS Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5838-1972
Anna LipzenUS Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2293-9329
William AndreopoulosUS Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9097-1123
Jasmyn PangilinanUS Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.
Robert RileyUS Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0224-0975
Hope HundleyUS Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5071-4587
Hyunsoo NaUS Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4386-017X
Kerrie BarryUS Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8999-6785
Igor V GrigorievUS Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3136-8903
Jason E StajichDepartment of Microbiology and Plant Pathology, University of California Riverside, Riverside, CA, 92507, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7591-0020
Peter G KennedyDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Minnesota, St Paul, MN, 55108, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2615-3892
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory · USUniversity of California, Riverside · USDuke University · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · USUniversity of Florida · USUniversity of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa · USUniversity of Minnesota · USVrije Universiteit Brussel · BE

Funding

Acquisition of a Scalable Storage Cluster for Data Intensive NIH ResearchS10OD016290 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE · PI GIRKE, THOMAS · 2014 to 2014
$593k
NIH HHS S10 OD016290
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While there has been significant progress characterizing the 'symbiotic toolkit' of ectomycorrhizal (ECM) fungi, how host specificity may be encoded into ECM fungal genomes remains poorly understood. We conducted a comparative genomic analysis of ECM fungal host specialists and generalists, focusing on the specialist genus Suillus. Global analyses of genome dynamics across 46 species were assessed, along with targeted analyses of three classes of molecules previously identified as important determinants of host specificity: small secreted proteins (SSPs), secondary metabolites (SMs) and G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs). Relative to other ECM fungi, including other host specialists, Suillus had highly dynamic genomes including numerous rapidly evolving gene families and many domain expansions and contractions. Targeted analyses supported a role for SMs but not SSPs or GPCRs in Suillus host specificity. Phylogenomic-based ancestral state reconstruction identified Larix as the ancestral host of Suillus, with multiple independent switches between white and red pine hosts. These results suggest that like other defining characteristics of the ECM lifestyle, host specificity is a dynamic process at the genome level. In the case of Suillus, both SMs and pathways involved in the deactivation of reactive oxygen species appear to be strongly associated with enhanced host specificity.

Indexed as

MycorrhizaePinusEvolution, MolecularFungiGenome, FungalGenomicsSpecializationgenomicsG-protein coupled receptorshost specificitysecondary metabolitessmall secreted proteinsSuillus

Identifiers

PMID33355923
PMCPMC7969408
OpenAlexW3117288854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.