ReviewDer Pathologe2021
[Interstitial lung disease in infancy and early childhood].
Review in Der Pathologe, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Childhood interstitial lung disease].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Interstitial lung disease in infancy and early childhood: a clinicopathological primer.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2022Review
- Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diffuse interstitial lung disease of infancy (chILD) shows a spectrum of disease substantially different from that of adults. Established classification systems divide chILD into conditions that are more prevalent in infancy and conditions that occur at any age. The classification is based on a multidisciplinary approach including clinical, radiological, genetic, and histological findings. Lung biopsies become necessary if other diagnostic investigations have not identified a precise chILD or if severe or refractory respiratory distress of unknown cause is present. As the majority of pediatric lung biopsies will be received first by pathologists outside of specialist centers this review summarizes relevant clinical and histological findings of chILD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.