Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33355685›Full record

ReviewDer Orthopade2021

[Patellofemoral inlay implants-an innovation in patellofemoral joint arthroplasty?]

Hannes Degenhardt, Andreas B Imhoff, Matthias J Feucht, Jonas Pogorzelski

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Orthopade, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 85% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hannes DegenhardtAbteilung für Sportorthopädie, Klinikumrechts der Isar, TU München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, München, Deutschland.
Andreas B ImhoffAbteilung für Sportorthopädie, Klinikumrechts der Isar, TU München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, München, Deutschland.
Matthias J FeuchtAbteilung für Sportorthopädie, Klinikumrechts der Isar, TU München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, München, Deutschland.
Jonas PogorzelskiAbteilung für Sportorthopädie, Klinikumrechts der Isar, TU München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, München, Deutschland. jonas.pogorzelski@tum.de.
Klinikum rechts der Isar · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Isolated arthrosis of the patellofemoral joint is a rare and complex disease. After conservative therapy has been exhausted, the orthopedist has various soft-tissue and bone reconstructive procedures as well as cartilage regenerative procedures at his hands. In cases of failed or unsatisfactory therapy, patellofemoral arthroplasty continues to be controversially discussed as an alternative therapy. A closer look at these studies reveals promising results with the correct indication and patient selection. The different prosthesis designs provide good postoperative results while considering general and specific risks. The current generation of patellofemoral inlay prostheses shows high patient satisfaction with significant improvements in knee function and pain relief in mid-term outcomes. However, a relatively high revision rate must be considered.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeKnee ProsthesisOsteoarthritis, KneePatellofemoral JointHumansTreatment OutcomeCartilageJoint replacementKneeOsteoarthritisPatellofemoral joint

Identifiers

PMID33355685
OpenAlexW3118188022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.