ArticleJAMA network open2020
Comparison of Trends in Rates of Sexually Transmitted Infections Before vs After Initiation of HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis Among Men Who Have Sex With Men.
Article in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06860945 (Development of a Predictive Model for Sexually Transmitted Infections in Individuals Using Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis for HIV in Spain), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Development of a Predictive Model for Sexually Transmitted Infections in Individuals Using Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis for HIV in Spain
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trends in Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Use, Condom Use, and Sexually Transmitted Infections Among Men Who Have Sex with Men from 2014, 2017, and 2023.AIDS and behavior · 2026Article
- Antimicrobial-Resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae of Public Health Concern, New South Wales, Australia, 2022-2024.Emerging infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Optimal testing frequency for sexually transmitted infections among men who have sex with men and transgender women who use HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis in Australia, Brazil and Thailand: a cost-effectiveness analysis.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2026Article
- HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis Utilization and Reasons for Never Using Preexposure Prophylaxis Among Transfeminine Persons in the United States: Findings From the Transgender Women's Internet Survey and Testing (TWIST) Study.Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Article
- HIV PrEP use and unmet need among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men in London: An analysis of community cross-sectional surveys in England 2019-2022.HIV medicine · 2026Article
- The Relationship Between HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis Use and Laboratory-Confirmed Bacterial Sexually Transmitted Infection Positivity Among a Diverse, Multi-City Cohort of Sexually Active Sexual and Gender Minorities in the United States.AIDS patient care and STDs · 2026Article
- Testing paradox may explain increased observed prevalence of bacterial STIs among MSM on HIV PrEP: A modeling study.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Trends Analysis of Sexually Transmitted Infections Before and After Human Immunodeficiency Virus Pre-exposure Prophylaxis in the United States 2001-2022.Open forum infectious diseases · 2025Article
- High syphilis incidence among PrEP-adherent men who have sex with men and transgender women in Peru.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2025Article
- Sexually transmitted infections among pre-exposure prophylaxis users in a Swedish multi-centre cohort.European journal of public health · 2025Observational
- The role of tenofovir-based HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis in preventing HBV infection among men who have sex with men: insights from China.Infectious diseases of poverty · 2025Article
- Multilevel Intervention to Support Tailored and Responsive HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Care in Rural North Carolina: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- Likelihood of HIV and recent bacterial sexually transmitted infections among transgender and non-binary individuals in 20 European countries, October 2023 to April 2024.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2024Article
- Trajectories of Adherence to Oral Pre-exposure Prophylaxis and Risks of HIV and Sexually Transmitted Infections.Open forum infectious diseases · 2024Article
- Syphilis testing, incidence, and reinfection among gay and bisexual men in Australia over a decade spanning HIV PrEP implementation: an analysis of surveillance data from 2012 to 2022.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2024Article
- Routine Data Analysis of HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Use and Rates of Sexually Transmitted Infections Since Coverage of HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis by the Statutory Health Insurance in Germany.Archives of sexual behavior · 2024Article
- Questioning risk compensation: pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and sexually transmitted infections among men who have sex with men, capital region of Denmark, 2019 to 2022.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2024Article
- Doxycycline postexposure prophylaxis for prevention of sexually transmitted infections.Topics in antiviral medicine · 2023Review
- Assessing disparity in the distribution of HIV and sexually transmitted infections in Australia: a retrospective cross-sectional study using Gini coefficients.BMJ public health · 2023Article
- Sexually transmitted infections in Spain: Current status.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
17 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: There have been concerns that HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) may be associated with increases in sexually transmitted infections (STIs) because of subsequent reductions in condom use and/or increases in sexual partners. Objective: To determine trends in STI test positivity among high-risk men who have sex with men (MSM) before and after the start of HIV PrEP. Design, Setting, and Participants: A before-after analysis was conducted using a subcohort of a single-group PrEP implementation study cohort in New South Wales, Australia (Expanded PreEP Implementation in Communities in New South Wales [EPIC-NSW]), from up to 1 year before enrollment if after January 1, 2015, and up to 2 years after enrollment and before December 31, 2018. STI testing data were extracted from a network of 54 sexual health clinics and 6 primary health care clinics Australia-wide, using software to deidentify, encrypt, and anonymously link participants between clinics. A cohort of MSM dispensed PrEP for the first time during the study, with 2 or more STI tests in the prior year and who tested during follow-up, were included from the EPIC-NSW cohort of HIV-negative participants with high-risk sexual behavior. Data analysis was performed from June to December 2019. Exposures: Participants were dispensed coformulated tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (300 mg) and emtricitabine (200 mg) as HIV PrEP. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was STI, measured using test positivity, defined as the proportion of participants testing positive for an STI at least once per quarter of follow-up. Outcomes were calculated for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoea by site of infection (anorectal, pharyngeal, urethral, or any) and for syphilis. Results: Of the EPIC-NSW cohort of 9709 MSM, 2404 were included in the before-after analysis. The mean (SD) age of the participants was 36 (10.4) years, and 1192 (50%) were Australia-born. STI positivity was 52% in the year after PrEP (23.3% per quarter; 95% CI, 22.5%-24.2% per quarter) with no significant trend (mean rate ratio [RR] increase of 1.01 per quarter [95% CI, 0.99-1.02]; P = .29), compared with 50% positivity in the year prior to PrEP (20.0% per quarter [95% CI, 19.04%-20.95% per quarter]; RR for overall STI positivity, 1.17 [95% CI, 1.10-1.24]; P < .001), with an increase in quarterly STI positivity (mean RR of 1.08 per quarter, or an 8% increase per quarter [95% CI, 1.05-1.11]; P < .001; RR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.90-0.96]; P < .001). Findings were similar when stratified by specific STIs and anatomical site. Conclusions and Relevance: STI rates were high but stable among high-risk MSM while taking PrEP, compared with a high but increasing trend in STI positivity before commencing PrEP. These findings suggest the importance of considering trends in STIs when describing how PrEP use may be associated with STI incidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.