Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33355268›Full record

Trial reportBMJ global health2020

Effective prevention of intimate partner violence through couples training: a randomised controlled trial of

Kristin Dunkle, Erin Stern, Sangeeta Chatterji, Lori Heise

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ global health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06768502 (Effectiveness of Community-based Approach in Reducing the Intimate Partner Violence), which is not on this map. Cited by 57 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06768502 nacompletednot on this map

Effectiveness of Community-based Approach in Reducing the Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) Exposure and Outcome: a Randomized Control Trial of IPV Victimization and Perpetration in Rwanda

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of RwandaRan2020 to 2020Enrolled62ConditionsIntimate Partner Violence (IPV), Anxiety, Depression, Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)ArmsCommunity Based Approach (CBA)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kristin DunkleGender and Health Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Tygerberg, Western Cape, South Africa kdunkle@mrc.ac.za.ORCID 0000-0003-3071-5544
Erin SternGender Violence and Health Centre, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Locon, UK.
Sangeeta ChatterjiDepartment of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Lori HeiseDepartment of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBetween 2015 and 2018, three civil society organisations in Rwanda implemented

methodsSectors (n=28) were purposively selected based on density of village savings and loan association (VLSA) groups and randomised (with stratification by district) to either the full community-level

resultsWe enrolled 828 women and 821 men in the intervention sectors and 832 women and 830 men in the control sectors; at endline, 815 women (98.4%) and 763 men (92.9%) in the intervention and 802 women (96.4%) and 773 men (93.1%) were available for intention-to-treat analysis. Women in the intervention compared with control were less likely to report physical and/or sexual IPV at 24 months (adjusted relative risk (aRR)=0.44, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.59). Men in the intervention compared with control were also significantly less likely to report perpetration of physical and/or sexual IPV at 24 months (aRR=0.54, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.75). Additional intervention benefits included reductions in acceptability of wife beating, conflict with partner, depression, and corporal punishment against children and improved conflict management, communication, trust, self-efficacy, self-rated health, household earnings, food security and actions to prevent IPV. There were no study-related harms.

conclusionsThe

Indexed as

Intimate Partner ViolenceSexual PartnersAdultChildFamily CharacteristicsFemaleHumansMaleRural PopulationRwandaCluster randomised trialhealth education and promotionprevention strategiespublic health

Identifiers

PMID33355268
PMCPMC7757483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.