SynthesisBMJ global health2020
Cash transfers and child nutritional outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMJ global health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 97 citations in OpenAlex.
- Do Cash Transfer Programmes Affect Child Anaemia? Results From a Meta-Analysis.Maternal & child nutrition · 2025Pooled it
- Relationship of cash transfers with risk of overweight and obesity in children and adults: a systematic review.BMC public health · 2022Pooled it
- More evidence on cash transfers and child nutritional outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ global health · 2022Pooled it
- Unconditional cash transfers for reducing poverty and vulnerabilities: effect on use of health services and health outcomes in low- and middle-income countries.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Nutrition-sensitive agriculture programs increase dietary diversity in children under 5 years: A review and meta-analysis.Journal of global health · 2022Pooled it
- Effectiveness of cash-plus programmes on early childhood outcomes compared to cash transfers alone: A systematic review and meta-analysis in low- and middle-income countries.PLoS medicine · 2021Pooled it
- A Community Health Worker-Based Intervention on Anthropometric Outcomes of Children Aged 3 to 21 Months in Urban Pakistan, 2019-2021.American journal of public health · 2023Trial
- Effects of Nutrition Counselling and Unconditional Cash Transfer on Child Growth and Family Food Security in Internally Displaced Person Camps in Somalia-A Quasi-Experimental Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Trial
- Cash transfers targeting adolescent wellbeing: a scoping review of the literature in low- and middle-income countries.Global health action · 2026Article
- Understanding How Multisectoral Programs and Policies Across Systems Can Be Leveraged to Improve Maternal, Infant, and Child Nutrition in Guinea.The International journal of health planning and management · 2026Review
- Nutritional Status of Children 0-59 Months Old and Household Enrollment in theActa medica Philippina · 2026Article
- Power and entitlement: Addressing the structural drivers of food insecurity and malnutrition.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Prevention of wasting and nutritional oedema: evidence gaps identified during WHO guideline development.BMJ global health · 2025Article
- Brazil's Bolsa Família conditional cash transfer and child malnutrition: a nationwide birth cohort study.BMJ global health · 2025Article
- Economic and healthcare determinants of under-five mortality in low-income countries.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Measuring child food poverty: understanding the gap to achieving minimum dietary diversity.Public health nutrition · 2025Article
- Article
- Impact of conditional cash transfer on households food security in Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria.PloS one · 2025Article
- Cash transfer, maternal and child health outcomes: a scoping review in sub-Saharan Africa.Global health action · 2024Article
- Identifying measures for coverage of nutrition-sensitive social protection programs: Learnings from India.Maternal & child nutrition · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCash transfer (CT) programmes are implemented widely to alleviate poverty and provide safety nets to vulnerable households with children. However, evidence on the effects of CTs on child health and nutrition outcomes has been mixed. We systematically reviewed evidence of the impact of CTs on child nutritional status and selected proximate determinants.
methodsWe searched articles published between January 1997 and September 2018 using Agris, Econlit, Eldis, IBSS, IDEAS, IFPRI, Google Scholar, PubMed and World Bank databases. We included studies using quantitative impact evaluation methods of CTs with sample sizes over 300, targeted to households with children under 5 years old conducted in countries with gross domestic product per capita below US$10 000 at baseline. We conducted meta-analysis using random-effects models to assess the impact of CT programmes on selected child nutrition outcomes and meta-regression analysis to examine the association of programme characteristics with effect sizes.
resultsOut of 2862 articles identified, 74 articles were eligible for inclusion. We find that CTs have significant effects of 0.03±0.03 on height-for-age z-scores (p<0.03) and a decrease of 2.1% in stunting (95% CI -3.5% to -0.7%); consumption of animal-source foods (4.5%, 95% CI 2.9% to 6.0%); dietary diversity (0.73, 95% CI 0.28 to 1.19) and diarrhoea incidence (-2.7%, 95% CI -5.4% to -0.0%; p<0.05). The effects of CTs on weight-for-age z-scores and wasting were not significant (0.02, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.08; p<0.42) and (1.2%, 95% CI: -0.1% to 2.5%; p<0.07), respectively. We found that specific programme characteristics differentially modified the effect on the nutrition outcomes studied.
conclusionWe found that CT programmes targeted to households with young children improved linear growth and contributed to reduced stunting. We found that the likely pathways were through increased dietary diversity, including through the increased consumption of animal-source foods and reduced incidence of diarrhoea. With heightened interest in nutrition-responsive social protection programmes to improve child nutrition, we make recommendations to inform the design and implementation of future programmes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.