Trial reportEvidence-based mental health2021
Creating a prepared mental health workforce: comparative illustrations of implementation strategies.
Trial report in Evidence-based mental health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pilot study of implementing Managing and Adapting Practice in a German psychotherapy master's program.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Adolescents: An Opportunity to Build Resilient Systems.American journal of health promotion : AJHP · 2023Article
- Common Elements Approaches to Implementation Research and Practice: Methods and Integration with Intervention Science.Global implementation research and applications · 2023Article
- Time for a paradigm shift for psychotherapies?Evidence-based mental health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPsychotherapy implementation must contend with the task of preparing a mental health workforce to provide the highest quality services to as much of a service population as possible, in high-income as well as low-to-middle income countries.
objectiveWe outline general challenges and solutions and investigate how well various implementation strategies would fit a clinical population.
methodsUsing a data set from a prior cluster randomised trial with a clinically diverse population and 33 intervention practices, we presented multiple illustrations comparing the ability of different implementation strategies to serve youth and families with procedures in which service providers were trained.
findingsA series of survival functions demonstrated that many common implementation strategies are unlikely to create a prepared workforce, given the large and diverse number of practices needed to be mastered by providers. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: 'Benchmark' solutions that afforded superior coverage of the service population could be supported through paced learning approaches (ie, training interventions a little at a time) using extensible, modular intervention designs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.