ArticleCancer research2021
MEK Inhibition Reverses Aberrant Signaling in Melanoma Cells through Reorganization of NRas and BRAF in Self Nanoclusters.
Article in Cancer research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- NRas Nanoclusters Mediate Crosstalk Between BRAF/ERK and PI3K/AKT Signaling in Melanoma Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Anoikis resistance and cancer.BMC cancer · 2025Review
- Natural products as therapeutics for malignant melanoma: preclinical evidence and mechanism.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Article
- NRas activity is regulated by dynamic interactions with nanoscale signaling clusters at the plasma membrane.iScience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Hotspot mutations of the oncogenes BRAF and NRas are the most common genetic alterations in cutaneous melanoma. Still, the nanoscale organization and signal coupling of these proteins remain incompletely understood, particularly upon expression of oncogenic NRas mutants. Here we employed single-molecule localization microscopy to study the nanoscale organization of NRas and BRAF at the plasma membrane (PM) of melanoma cells. NRas and BRAF resided in self-clusters that did not associate well in resting cells. In EGF-activated cells, NRas clusters became more diffused while overall protein levels at the PM increased; thus allowing enhanced association of NRas and BRAF and downstream signaling. In multiple melanoma cell lines, mutant NRas resided in more pronounced self-clusters relative to wild-type (WT) NRas yet associated more with the clustered and more abundant BRAF. In cells resistant to trametinib, a clinical MEK inhibitor (MEKi), a similar coclustering of NRas and BRAF was observed upon EGF activation. Strikingly, treatment of cells expressing mutant NRas with trametinib reversed the effect of mutant NRas expression by restoring the nonoverlapping self-clusters of NRas and BRAF and by reducing their PM levels and elevated pERK levels caused by mutant NRas. Our results indicate a new mechanism for signal regulation of NRas in melanoma through its nanoscale dynamic organization and a new mechanism for MEKi function in melanoma cells carrying NRas mutations but lacking MEK mutations. SIGNIFICANCE: Nanoscale dynamic organization of WT and mutant NRas relative to BRAF serves as a regulatory mechanism for NRas signaling and may be a viable therapeutic target for its sensitivity to MEKi.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.