Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33354929›Full record

ArticleDrug testing and analysis2021

Performance evaluation of handheld Raman spectroscopy for cocaine detection in forensic case samples.

Ruben F Kranenburg, Joshka Verduin, Renee de Ridder, Yannick Weesepoel, Martin Alewijn, Marcel Heerschop, Peter H J Keizers, Annette van Esch, Arian C van Asten

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Drug testing and analysis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Interpol Review of Drug Analysis 2019-2022.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ruben F KranenburgForensic Laboratory, Dutch National Police, Unit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1472-3739
Joshka VerduinForensic Laboratory, Dutch National Police, Unit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5862-6036
Renee de RidderForensic Laboratory, Dutch National Police, Unit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Yannick WeesepoelWageningen Food Safety Research, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5377-6588
Martin AlewijnWageningen Food Safety Research, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Marcel HeerschopDutch Customs Laboratory, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Peter H J KeizersNational Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2421-1067
Annette van EschNetherlands Forensic Institute (NFI), The Hague, The Netherlands.
Arian C van AstenVan't Hoff Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5392-3982

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Handheld Raman spectroscopy is an emerging technique for rapid on-site detection of drugs of abuse. Most devices are developed for on-scene operation with a user interface that only shows whether cocaine has been detected. Extensive validation studies are unavailable, and so are typically the insight in raw spectral data and the identification criteria. This work evaluates the performance of a commercial handheld Raman spectrometer for cocaine detection based on (i) its performance on 0-100 wt% binary cocaine mixtures, (ii) retrospective comparison of 3,168 case samples from 2015 to 2020 analyzed by both gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and Raman, (iii) assessment of spectral selectivity, and (iv) comparison of the instrument's on-screen results with combined partial least square regression (PLS-R) and discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) models. The limit of detection was dependent on sample composition and varied between 10 wt% and 40 wt% cocaine. Because the average cocaine content in street samples is well above this limit, a 97.5% true positive rate was observed in case samples. No cocaine false positives were reported, although 12.5% of the negative samples were initially reported as inconclusive by the built-in software. The spectral assessment showed high selectivity for Raman peaks at 1,712 (cocaine base) and 1,716 cm

Indexed as

Law EnforcementCentral Nervous System StimulantsCocaineFeasibility StudiesGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryHumansLimit of DetectionReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesSpectrum Analysis, RamanCentral Nervous System StimulantsCocaineillicit drug analysison-scene detectionportable deviceRaman spectrometerTruNarc

Identifiers

PMID33354929
PMCPMC8248000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.