Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33354750›Full record

ArticlePaediatric drugs2021

Clinical and Economic Evaluation of the Impact of Midazolam on Morphine Therapy for Pain Relief in Critically Ill Ventilated Infants with Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Dina Abushanab, Fouad F Abounahia, Omar Alsoukhni, Mohammed Abdelaal, Daoud Al-Badriyeh

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Paediatric drugs, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Which surfactant is cost-effective in Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome?Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2026
    Article
  4. Neonatal Pain Management: Is There An Endocrinal Response?Endocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets · 2025
    Review
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Dina AbushanabDrug Information Department, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Fouad F AbounahiaNeonatal Intensive Care Unit Department, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Omar AlsoukhniPharmacy Department, Al Jalila Children's Specialty Hospital, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Mohammed AbdelaalPharmacy and Drug Control, Ministry of Public Health, Doha, Qatar.
Daoud Al-BadriyehCollege of Pharmacy, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar. daoud.a@qu.edu.qa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7791-954X
Hamad Medical Corporation · QAAl Jalila Foundation · AEMinistry of Public Health · QAQatar University · QA

Funding

Qatar University QUUG-CPH-CPH-15/16-8
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe impact of midazolam on the overall performance of morphine therapy for pain in ventilated neonates with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) has never been investigated.

objectiveThis study is a clinical and economic analysis of morphine monotherapy versus morphine plus midazolam in ventilated infants with RDS.

methodsA decision-analytic model from the hospital perspective was developed to follow the consequences of the use of the study drugs. Clinical and resource utilization data were extracted based on a retrospective cohort study of 104 neonates with RDS receiving morphine alone versus in combination with midazolam at the main neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) in Qatar, from 2014 to 2019. Primary outcome measures were the analgesia success rate, via the Premature Infant Pain Profile scale, and overall costs of therapies. Multivariate statistical analyses confirmed no significant variations in baseline characteristics between study groups.

resultsWith 0.05 significance and 80% power, morphine had a higher rate of successful analgesia (65.4 vs. 34.6%; risk ratio 1.91; 95% confidence interval 1.11-3.28; p = 0.019). Overall costs were also in favor of morphine compared with its combination with midazolam, with cost savings of 40,959 Qatari Riyal ($US11,222), year 2019/20 values. The Monte Carlo analyses confirmed the economic advantage of morphine alone in 100% of cases and demonstrated that it is not sensitive to uncertainties in study model inputs.

conclusionsMorphine monotherapy enabled enhanced pain relief over its combination with midazolam in the NICU, at a reduced overall cost. Morphine alone, therefore, seems to be a dominant analgesia strategy.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisCritical IllnessFemaleHumansHypnotics and SedativesInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureIntensive Care Units, NeonatalMaleMidazolamMorphinePainPain MeasurementRespiration, ArtificialRespiratory Distress Syndrome, NewbornRetrospective StudiesHypnotics and SedativesMidazolamMorphine

Identifiers

PMID33354750
PMCPMC7755454
OpenAlexW3113540529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.